RE: AnCaps ***TRIGGERED*** by Vaccines! - A dialogue on the adverse reaction.
Hi, @gduran. Thanks for the comment. I provided several factual examples of medical corruption/malice in the video such as the now infamous "Tuskegee Experiment," direct quotes from a CDC whistleblower and also an admission from the former head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, that vaccines indeed do trigger "autism-like symptoms."
As for anarchism, it does not, by definition, mean "no hierarchy" but simply "no rulers." A situation such as working for a company of your choice involves a hierarchy (the boss, the assistant manager, etc) but not a ruler. The idea of a "ruler" always implies the use of force, ultimately.
The Greek "An Archos" literally means "without" (an) "ruler" (archos). Nothing of hierarchies is addressed etymologically.
All the negative situations you listed above were exacerbated and indeed enabled by the state and its systematic suffocation of the free market. Competition was "disallowed" through state sanctions, regulations, and legislation.
My son was healthy and normal boy, not anymore after he had dtap ... age 18 months his skills was starting to disappear, he stopped saying words, didn't look at us anymore, stopped chew the food (basically back to pure food), sleep only 3 to 4 hours in 24 hours and yet we found out he has 28 foods allergies.
Since then our "lives" aren't good anymore.
So sorry to hear that, @lugina. If you ever want to tell your story and need help getting it out there, please let me know. I would be glad to help anytime.
Hi @kafkanarchy84 thanks for responding, we can't undo for what happened to my son. We're helping him and do whatever it takes to get him back, It will not be the same because his right frontal lobe brain isn't working properly as before.
I do start posting our experiences with some treatments that we think is working and also want to share inside of "Autism World"
It's amazing seeing my son gains back some skills and glad to know lots of people out there understand what we been through (especially you).
Ok, good answers except in the anarchism part, see I just can't understand how anarcho-capitalism can work. They are just opposites capitalism without a head or leader just won't work. Well I'll be waiting for other posts from you there is always something to learn, and remember I always debate, doesn't mean I am against what you say or that I think you have bad ideas, just when I feel not so comfortable or maybe knowledgeable about something I like to know why another person is for it.
Why do you assume anarchism to be apposed to leadership or hierarchy? By definition it is not, as I showed above. AnCaps/Voluntaryists/Market Anarchists are totally fine with voluntary hierarchies. It is coercion that we view as illegitimate.
And thanks for being open-minded. I am always glad to talk, and hope you understand that I am not "against you" either. I appreciate the commentary!
Capitalism or fascism/corporatism?
If you are talking about capitalism, that is, by definition, voluntary interaction. AnCaps love voluntary interaction. That's the primary goal. We seek to have all interactions between humans to be consensual and voluntary.
AnCaps have businesses, communities, courts, and other organizations. They just have them without special protections, double standards, and the use of unjustified force.
Please Google Voluntaryism. Governance without government is not a fantasy. The difference is the first is voluntary, and the latter is not.
Capitalism: an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. I don't see any voluntary interaction there, what I see is the smartest, greediest and the people with most guts get the biggest piece of the cake, like in the American west, it had no direct government for years these lands weren't even part of the US but they were owned by the powerful ranchers and bankers, apparently the undertakers made a lot of money too.
Voluntaryism: a philosophy which holds that all forms of human association should be voluntary, a term coined in this usage by Auberon Herbert in the 19th century, and gaining renewed use since the late 20th century, especially among libertarians.
Ok, so this is even worse suppose I don't volunteer what happens then? I'm not trying to pick a fight I just want to know what your answer is, do I get kicked out? Do I lose any rights because I don't volunteer?
You have assumed "private owners" is only the "smartest, greediest" people. I am an individual in the market, and I am a private owner. Perhaps you're thinking of corporatism/fascism where the government is controlled by big business? Or are you a collectivist who doesn't believe in any private ownership?
You don't volunteer for what? Did I rob you? Rape you? What have I done that you didn't volunteer for exactly? Please do more than look up definitions of words, or you'll never understand the topic being discussed. If you leave me and my property alone, I'll leave you and yours alone. It's that simple.
No I am assuming that is what will happen, because it is always what happens, why do you think we are in the state we are in? Because greedy people decided they wanted more. Yes, if I leave you alone you leave me alone works, but just as far as someone doesn't decide he deserves more then the others.
Who decides who deserves what?
We are in the situation we are in because there is a system to take over by controllers.
Without government those predators have no system of control.
@finnian, this state were the strongest control most of everything goes as far back as the start of written history, I really admire your stance, I am not kidding, but I know how people are, eventually someone wants more and finds ways to get it, it's not that I don't agree with your idea as much as I don't believe it is feasible in the long run.