You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Dear Steemit, Thank you for everything

in #steemexclusivelast year
Sabemos que la plataforma es descentralizada pero debería de contar con una herramienta que se pueda usar de inmediato para bloquear el steem cuando se descubre o se sospecha de un caso como este o como muchos otros que han sucedido, donde personas sin escrúpulos se atreven a engañar a todo un público de espectadores y peor aun a un equipo de curaciones, una vez con las pruebas expuesta que se decida si liberar el steem, y en caso de que sea un robo hacia otro usuario devolver el steem al usuario afectado.

Es injusto que se vaya creando un sp en una comunidad con tanto esfuerzo y que una persona apague y se lleve todo, como también es lamentable que la gran reputación que un malvado alcanza con sus engaños, hoy dia la tecnologia nos ayuda mucho a poder cerciorarnos de cualquier información y deberia de hacer reuniones de representantes de steem cada cierto tiempo bien sea para conocerse o para establecer reglas o ver como va el progreso de steem y para ello hay aplicaciones muy sencillas y confiables como zoom.

Esperemos que cada dia se aprenda mas y fallemos menos.

Sort:  

We know that the platform is decentralized but it should have a tool that can be used immediately to block Steem when a case like this is discovered or suspected or like many others that have happened

If that exists then such a platform is tending towards centralization because a feature like that dents decentralization. That said, for an organization in a decentralized ecosystem, multi-signature can be a solution to avoid assets being carted away by a single person or one faction of the team (because a certain consensus has to be reached in form of signatures and it must be complete before such transactions can become valid and added to a block).

For individuals, your keys, your funds. If private keys are leaked to others then the fault starts from the owner. And I agree with your proposal on how regular Steem representatives should be meeting, this will help a lot.

Some time ago when the country representatives were still active, I found out that even many of those guys (CRs) back then are accomplices helping fake accounts to bypass verification and backing them on their abuses (when they were caught) which seems they are the ones behind the accounts. Back then, I suggested that when red flags are raised about certain accounts even when the native CR has conducted his/her investigation, a cross-country investigation should also follow (to enable another rep from other parts of the world to verify the claims) before resolution.

These guys have utilized their positions to abuse the platform and I think a case of such is @nadiaturrina, the account must be one of those created by the past community leaders/Newcomers' community greeters/CR. I think the appointment of Steem representatives at this stage should even embrace KYC verification because it won't be funny to know in the future that a person holds more than one Steem representative position.

I hope you are doing great, @mile16. Greetings!

Hoy día hay muchas formas de poder verificar las identidades de personas, así como ocultarlas pero creo que en la medida que vamos aprendiendo de errores se pueden ir probando métodos más eficaces, como ese de las reuniones mensuales a nivel global solo de Representantes, y la propuesta de verificación KYC puede resultar en buena idea, al fin y al cabo esto es lo que hacen en la mayoría de las empresas y si estamos comprometidos con steem debemos tomar la blockchain con n mucha más seriedad .

Te envío saludos amigo y espero que estés cada día mucho mejor .

...after all this is what they do in most companies and if we are committed to steem we must take the blockchain much more seriously

That's very valid, dear. Even new crypto mining Apps require that users undergo KYC verification to be sure a node is being held by a user and not more. This they do to curb the attitude toward rewards farming.

How much more is Steem which has been in existence for a long time, it's necessary that position holders go through a verification like that to at least avoid further heartbreaking news like we recently see.

Thanks for your time, @mile16. I tell you, I'm getting better day in and day out. Greetings to you.

You are very correct on this sir.

I think the appointment of Steem representatives at this stage should even embrace KYC verification because it won't be funny to know in the future that a person holds more than one Steem representative position.

This can be very possible and that is the reason i suggested physical meetup within a given country. We all must learn to sacrifice for the betterment of the platform. If such a program should be hosted then it should be announced before time so that everyone gets prepare for the task

This can be very possible and that is the reason i suggested physical meetup within a given country. We all must learn to sacrifice for the betterment of the platform. If such a program should be hosted then it should be announced before time so that everyone gets prepare for the task

Great one. Well, it may not be possible to have everyone in a country at the event but at least for many of the top users (Admins/MODs/Community Curators and so on), it should be mandatory with no excuse, and with the right resource (in form of support from individual communities toward the success of the event).

It's better to do this than receive shameful news that a well-known account turns out to be one of those farming accounts flying around in the ecosystem. Great suggestion, @simonnwigwe.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.13
JST 0.029
BTC 57716.25
ETH 3155.19
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.26