I don't know! There are lots of of ways to try to make evolution work in our chronology, and my whole life I've used evolution and adaptation as a blueprint for how the animal kingdom and humans came to be. The troubles that arise with an objective study of the theory are numerous, and there are quite a few things that never made sense to me about it. For instance, but I think strangely sometimes, I believe that such a question as 'which came first, the chicken or the egg?' is a fair and legitimate question in a review of evolution, and while we know that through breeding and genetics we can make a better chicken over a few generations, and natural selection serves a similar function over time, there's still that thing about the egg. What a precarious leap that must have been for the original chicken, or chicken egg; an entire species depending on lots of factors, like that specialized beak that the chick used to break the first eggshell-- would it work?

Here in this piece I mainly wanted to explore the possibility that we had evolved according to evolution, but had done it in a different habitat than the one we're in now, and I'd never heard a lot of speculation that maybe we developed indoors-- inside the planet, so I went ahead and speculated that myself here. I don't think it really went over too well, maybe the article makes me sound like a creationist by default when I question Darwinism, but hell even Darwin questioned the idea of evolution, and I am a long-time fan of his, so I feel free to elaborate on those questions, and I like the idea of a hollow planet, so I mixed the two together for this fun little jaunt. I still don't know how we came to be here, and dunno if the Earth is hollow, I just enjoy adding logic to old ideas to see what surfaces in the mix.