You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Witness Update -- Team Sircork

in #witness-category7 years ago (edited)

omg ... is this even real? Surely somebody's just trying to get a laugh here? Well, it worked.

On the outside chance that it is serious, I'm confused as to why this would be a reason to not vote witness teams. Nothing has gone wrong with the witness. Still holding strong. No trouble on the horizon. One of the partners just had other things she wanted to do that conflicted. How is that problematic? I don't see it. Oh, well.

Sort:  

@rhondak : The short answer, from the link posted above, for not wanting team witnesses is ...

...that this trend is taking the voting system of the blockchain and making it less representational and more 'run by committee'

and

... if they ever make it to the sacred 20 my preference is one witness with one vote that answers directly to those who have voted for them.

Hope that clarifies it for you.

Nope. Doesn't clarify why you'd give an inactive witness/user your proxy. And that lack of judgment pretty much negates any other argument you try to make. Kinda tells me I'm just listening to the wind blow.

Guess you may have missed that Stuw's departure was not know to me, @rhondak. A message notice that one's witness has gone inactive and release of their votes might be good mod for the next fork. 👍

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.20
JST 0.034
BTC 89254.99
ETH 3064.10
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.92