You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemchiller goes witness! Let's make Steem safe again ;)
I'm responding talking about HIVE where there is no ninjamine...
But the HIVE did NOT remove the entire "ninjamine". They only removed the part controlled by JSUN.
What I said was the wider community discussing and arriving at consensus is better than a few [17] select so called experts thinking they know best.
17 KINGS =/= "wider community consensus"
No, the ninjamine that was the issue was SUN's... it's the one which the real problem in all this, Ned, started the problem with. The code for non-voting should have been triggered when it was built into the code instead of letting Ned string the community along claiming it was community funds.
The other ones who mined at the beginning never made any claims other than they had mined Steem and it was their stake.
BTW.. when you quote someone, it doesn't mean you get to edit what they have said. That ends a conversation through deception.
Please be more specific.
It is common practice to trim quotes with "..." at the beginning or end of a direct quote and or insert words with "[]".
If I have misquoted you somewhere, please explain exactly where.
It is never a practice to insert your own editing into a quote. That terminates a conversation when someone messes with my words.
If I have misquoted you somewhere, please explain exactly where.
That seems rather convenient. How is one person's secret stash of "free" steem any better than another?
Non-binding "agreements" or "reassurances" =/= forfeiture of voting rights
I'll bet that if JSUN bought-up a ton of stake from other random accounts, "the community" would be begging NED to vote against JSUN (to "save the community").