I didn't hear Lynette say her work is not an "indictment of bitcoin".
She didn't say that.
She only used the word "No"at 32:31 as an interjection with regards to Sean's long description of the current cyrptos-blockchain technology situation including bitcoin.

However, I did hear at 32:46 , verbatim :

"I can see alot of benefits with this technology, there is good but...".
Begin here with the specific discussion:

So.
Tell me WHERE Lynette said what you say she said?
You are 'inferring' she said something specifically, because it fits your point of view.
Also, Lynette is not uneducated about cryptos AND she most DEFINITELY understands what blockchain technology is.
Lynette Zang specifically references the NSA here:

https://www.itmtrading.com/blog/drive-cryptocurrencies-really-driving-bus-lynette-zang/
http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm

Just because you have a fancy signature- 'cryptohero info' doesn't mean you know everything about OTHER PEOPLE's UNDERSTANDING of blockchain.
So.
Once again, where did you hear "Lynette now claims her work is not an "indictment of bitcoin""?
X-