You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: NEVER LET A GOOD CRISIS GO TO WASTE -- Lynette Zang
Am I the only one who caught that Lynette now claims her work is not an "indictment of bitcoin"? Quite the reversal from all those uninformed hit-pieces you were running a month ago, eh, Ms. Zang?
I'm not sure if this woman is just woefully uneducated on database technology in general or if this is deliberate duplicity with a smile, but the way she takes hard, verifiable documentation and transposes on her own wild, baseless theories is incredibly dangerous.
I didn't hear Lynette say her work is not an "indictment of bitcoin".
She didn't say that.
She only used the word "No"at 32:31 as an interjection with regards to Sean's long description of the current cyrptos-blockchain technology situation including bitcoin.
However, I did hear at 32:46 , verbatim :
"I can see alot of benefits with this technology, there is good but...".
Begin here with the specific discussion:
So.
Tell me WHERE Lynette said what you say she said?
You are 'inferring' she said something specifically, because it fits your point of view.
Also, Lynette is not uneducated about cryptos AND she most DEFINITELY understands what blockchain technology is.
Lynette Zang specifically references the NSA here:
https://www.itmtrading.com/blog/drive-cryptocurrencies-really-driving-bus-lynette-zang/
http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm
Just because you have a fancy signature- 'cryptohero info' doesn't mean you know everything about OTHER PEOPLE's UNDERSTANDING of blockchain.
So.
Once again, where did you hear "Lynette now claims her work is not an "indictment of bitcoin""?
X-