You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Using an astronomical calendar to analyze the first solar-cycle of Steemit
Your contribution cannot be approved because it does not follow the Utopian Rules.
Dear @etheranoon, account creation statistics covering the time range you chose were shown before, one example here. I see no additional insights or conclusions on those numbers from grouping the same data into different time intervals and comparing those.
You can contact us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Yes, I think I have read all the posts related to Steemit statistics.
In my analysis I present another point of view to show that the use of the Gregorian calendar distorts the results and that a more adequate calendar is possible. That is, my contribution places more emphasis on the method used than on the data. Sometimes we can't see the forest for the trees.
It is a more transcendental issue than it may seem at first glance, although fortunately the results have to be coherent with the previous analyzes.
thank you.
Hey @crokkon, I just gave you a tip for your hard work on moderation. Upvote this comment to support the utopian moderators and increase your future rewards!
Aaawww @crokkon, you honor me more than I deserve. Thanks!