I agree, it's pretty. I don't know how much time you spent doing it. I have to admit, when I read a comic book, a barely glance at the pictures, I just read the words, so I am not your target audience for a visual feast.
I agree, it's pretty. I don't know how much time you spent doing it. I have to admit, when I read a comic book, a barely glance at the pictures, I just read the words, so I am not your target audience for a visual feast.
Seriously? Haha! Comics should be read with 50% pictures in mind haha! I guess you're just more of a words guy. No wonder you don't like using pictures in your posts haha! That's a cool pathological discovery.
It took quite some time to make, so if it won't have the reception I hoped for, I'll just chalk it up to a great exercise but won't be repeating it again in the future.
Ya. It seems like it would take a while. I'd feel like it probably wasn't the most efficient return on investment.
What would take a while? If you're referring to the time I spent doing this, then we may just have different standards of measurement.
Eh? Yes, you said
"It took quite some time to make, so if it won't have the reception I hoped for, I'll just chalk it up to a great exercise but won't be repeating it again in the future."
And I was sympathizing: if it took a lot of time to make, and it didn't increase responsiveness, and you did it TO increase responsiveness (not just because you enjoy doing it), then it's not a particularly efficient way to spend your limited time...
As I said, different measurements. "Reception" doesn't always mean "increased responsiveness." It could be the quality of the responses or whatever, but the fact is I never disclosed it and it's all subjective for me.