If you can see it so well, why can't you come up with reliable evidence to show it exists? Why would there be no proof for something that really happens to you?

Because scientists have divided things into physics and metaphysics.

Things from the metaphysical realm, are all woo-woo, and cannot be used in any proofs for "science". Science is really set in the materialistic universe. Accepting anything outside of it is verbotin.

Just look at the arguments for intelligent design. Anyone who believes in intelligent design is thrown out of the science community. Black balled. Their papers stricken from the record.

The double slit experiment disproves Einstein's theory of relativity.

Further, all of the supposed evidence for the theory of relativity is all bunk. Einstein's theory explained Mercury's orbit much better than Newtons, however, it was still only 96% accurate. A lady published her findings recently with a 99.999% accuracy, and her theory does not use relativity.

The GPS satellite thing is a myth. I have had some people in the know say that it doesn't exist. And, it is impossible to prove or disprove. There is nothing verifiable about it. There is one group in one company that does it all. You either believe them or you don't.

Spooky action at a distance. That was what freaked Einstein out the most.

So, the latest double slit experiment finds that if you observe the "particle" that it behaves as a particle. Further, if you observe it in the future, it behaves as a particle in the past.

Further, there are many, many forks I can stick into the theory of relativity. That it is still in the science books is beyond me.