You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: NATIONAL COIN SHORTAGE...
Be very careful of people who Down-Vote... Even if it's only a 2% down-vote... They tend to Gang up on people with extra down-votes... Stay clear of them... I'm heading out to work on my New and Improved Garden Rooms...
June 29, 2021... 4.4 Hollywood Time...
Goodluck with your garden rooms. downvoters are the worst. I don't know if any strategy really works. They're supposed to be to allow people to collectively regulate content; however, people have found a loophole using delegations to allow people to centralize policing of the platform such that bullying can be proliferated.
I'm against centralization of any kind.
Persistence is the key. Downvotes work with persistence.
They don't work against plagiarism. People committing crimes get away with it. They just move on. They're not gone. They don't stop. They always come back. Downvoting guarantees you have to work at it perpetually. To keep up the downvoting, you do what you do now which is you become that which you are fighting against SPAM. I wouldn't call that a win.
Another perspective that I do not share.
No two people can share the same perspective. You can't occupy the same space. This is obvious. You can disagree if you want, but it's facts. It's facts because you are not the first to do this. Plagiarism is a battle that has been fought on steemit from the beginning. It was fought by people with much more SP than you against people with more SP than you. They also accomplished much more than you. Still look! It's still here. Those warriors moved on.
I mean look! You're upvoting yourself to keep it going. You're running a delegation racket to get more SP. Even if you're winning, you're losing.
Supposing you downvote someone for plagiarizing. What consequences do they face? You can have a different perspective all you want, but tell me. What real-life consequences do they face for breaking the law?
Seeing the truth. Knowing the truth. Believing the lies.
And when the time is right I will move on too.
Why did you stop spamming with @perpetuator? A loss of income. The primary reason that many people join the platform in the first place. If they stop profiting from plagiarism and spam, then why continue to do it? Why are you continuing to farm when you are no longer profiting from it?
Since there were no consequences, what do you think the plagiarists will do when that happens?
It depends what happens when this time comes - there are plenty of people now fighting plagiarism and spam on Steem. This has continued to increase in the past 3 months. I'm hopeful that this awareness and community spirit will make endingplagiarism and people like me unnecessary.
Assuming I did spam with that account. I didn't lose anything. I was back to where I was before that account. If anything, I made a bunch of money for free and I'll just move on to something else. It's effectively losing their job. What if your consequence for forgery was you lost your forgery job? You'll just go get another like anyone else. No consequences.
I love this argument because you make it with the pretext that you are right, then disprove it. You say that lack of profit == real-world consequence. Then ask why it doesn't work. LOL
It doesn't work. You tell yourself it works because you see a downtrend in activity. Yeah, things that are less profitable will decrease, but they come back.
Let's put it another way. What if police didn't stop crimes? They actually committed them in an effort to remove the profitability from criminals. They though, "If we make crime less profitable for criminals, they'll stop, right?" Police, having the backing of people do this. Instead of catching criminals for selling drugs. They sell the drugs to all the criminal's customers, so they go out of business. They're not impeded because they have the support of the people. They can freely commit crimes and "no one innocent is getting hurt".
Criminals go away, but the crime has not. The police are the criminals now and they're the legal authority. This is what you're doing.
Suppose the police out of the goodness of their hearts decide to stop committing crimes and profiting from it just because. Criminals will come back. Why? Because they were never arrested or faced consequences.
Making crime less profitable is not the same as reforming criminals to be upstanding citizens.
Really? "Assuming". The only reason I'm here is because you didn't like it and exposed all of your accounts to endingplagiarism (I still struggle to understand why you did this).
A nice analogy but one that is fundamentally flawed since the police are not dealing drugs. See me as a patron at a shop. You're the shoplifter. I catch you shoplifting and return the stolen item to the store. The shopkeeper is happy with me and gives me a mars bar for my troubles.
Making crime less profitable makes crime less attractive to criminals