You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Update [ June 17th, 2024 ] : Community Curators for July - Applications Open
It is very good that the suggestion of trying to cure by tags has been taken. However, I am only concerned about the fact that teams must study very well the existence of the publications they want to curate.
Perhaps it is too early to divide teams by tags, since this form of curation has been tested in the past with its limitations.
I think that for this time it is important and valuable to continue maintaining freedom in curation, as well as in tags, so that teams can complete their turns.
It occurs to me that it could be said that a team can be especially oriented towards certain tags of its choice, but not limited to them.
It would also be good for the teams to give feedback about their experience.🙂
We want all teams to continue to curate all types of posts on all subjects.
The idea of asking about tags is just so we can select teams with a wide range of interests.
Yes, now I understand. Good to Know.
Thank you so much for clarifying this point.
I think that in this way the teams will be able to apply taking into account their interests and also the areas that they dominate.🙂
It is excellent to promote the search for tags, I even suggest that the club5050 and burnsteem25 tags be secondary (without losing their purpose), this way users will be able to efficiently use the tags according to the type of content they share, sometimes I find posts about stories and the tag #history is not among the top 4, nor #writing, or in the worst case, there is none.
I will certainly be providing guidance on the use of labels, where necessary.