You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Do you think Palnet "holds no value" and disagree with minnowsupport bot?
Okay. So what you are saying is that
"I do not want to see postings on trending that I think not really good"
"I think certain amounts are too much, but I do not have a specific rule"
I agree that you may act as you want. But that also means that you should be okay with you getting downvotes, for example from sct.voter, for whatever reason, including "I think your post has too much reward."
Did I understand correctly?
곰돌이가 @glory7님의 소중한 댓글에 $0.032을 보팅해서 $0.008을 살려드리고 가요. 곰돌이가 지금까지 총 6530번 $74.522을 보팅해서 $84.847을 구했습니다. @gomdory 곰도뤼~
Sure if you want to downvote my content for any reason that is your right as a stake holder.
My issue is that the vote is purchased with SCT tokens.
Thank you for the reply. I don't think I am going to downvote (and my sp is not big anyway) - just wanted to know your thoughts on the issue.
곰돌이가 @glory7님의 소중한 댓글에 시세변동을 감안하여 $0.006을 보팅해서 $0.034을 지켜드리고 가요. 곰돌이가 지금까지 총 6533번 $74.554을 보팅해서 $84.935을 구했습니다. @gomdory 곰도뤼~
De-centralized, non-goverened: Everybody acts how they want, thus creating consensus.
It only starts to be distorted by greed (=buying huge votes).
Everybody has their own opinion about how much is too much; if everybody voices them > consensus!
And no body has a problem with receiving downvotes; they are an important and honest tool. btw. honest: You can judge your own post, and think about what's its value. If you earn less rewards, go and buy a vote. Me, I've sen by far more valuable posts paying out about 1STU...