You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Double-Blind Violins: Towards A More Objective Selection
I am really amazed by these blind tests. Professionals should get a feeling of all of this... they should... and they actually don't. That chocked me a little bit.
Very nice post by the way, also on the violin 101 part and the new technology part :)
The more devoid of critical thinking and appealing to expertise on a particular field, the more one should expect conflicts of interests will be a problem to innovation and truth.
I mean, I'm not 100% happy with the idea of machines making me obsolete, but such is technology.
Thanks for passing by to read :)
What do you mean by "machines"? Are you referring to machine-driven selection tests? I am a bit lost within our current context :)
Anyways. Machines are not making us obsolete. They will change our way of making things instead, I guess.
I mean Oracle systems. One probable consequence of double-blind tests effectiveness, if it were to become an extended practice, is automation of the process. This entails a lot of problems:
I will explain this in depth in my next post. "A forensic approach to cheaters."
Thanks for the clarifications. I am looking forward to read the next post.
Concerning item 1, I guess we are already there, unfortunately :(