RE: That's not Science, that's Religion
If vaccines are so safe why are professional doctors and nurses questioning them? Why aren't high ranking politicians that champion vaccines for the general public getting their own vaccines? You say the studies are out: Please cite these studies. Over what duration of time were they and who funded them? Were they double blind studies?
" If they were dangerous and scientists knew, don't you think someone would have blown the whistle by now?"
No, quite the contrary, in fact data that showed the risks of vaccines were destroyed because it would endanger profit margins. Yes there have been doctors blowing the whistle, they're called anti-vax activists and largely ridiculed and often put their careers on the line just to do so. Yes there are doctors out there that are against vaccines.
"most people don't question vaccine safety because its been proven many times to be safe. " So every time a new vaccine comes out it's "safe", hmmm I wonder if we replaced the word "vaccine" with "drug" and that same sentence would work. "Most people don't question drug safety because it's been proven many times to be safe." Tell that to the fentynal victims that are hopelessly addicted or dead. Yes every new drug is safe alright. See what I mean by faith not science? Aluminum is a known neurotoxin, so is mercury, both can be found in vaccines. Nevermind all the animal and human DNA, fermaldehyde and other noxious chemicals. Have you looked at a vaccine ingredient list lately?
"The issue here is not that people don't question vaccines, its that people wont accept the answers when they don't align with their current beliefs."
Let's assume for the same of argument vaccines could be made 100% safe. All the adjuvents taken out, no foreign DNA, no nothing. That STILL doesn't entitle the state to mandate a medical procedure. Mandated medicine of any kind is a violation of the Nuremburg code pure and simple. It's a violation of your medical freedoms. Even if you were giving out bubble gum, that would not entitle you to lock someone up or forcibly shove a stick of bubble gum down their throat against their will.
This is not a case of cognitive dissonence or confirmation bias. There are many highly rational and logical people opposed to vaccines and real evidence to support vaccines do in fact do harm. Do you think a doctor with a PhD just wakes up and says "I think I'd rather go against the mainstream position that vaccines are safe thus endangering my career and reputation."? Do you think anyone would do that without real valid evidence to support that? I mean come on.
I'm just happy that he didn't simply turn out to be another troll with that mild diatribe, but then again, we shall see if he looks at the evidence that Robert F Kennedy compiled about thimerosal specifically, and I am curious what he has to say about the rest of the proof that vaccines aren't efficacious. I don't know if it was needed, to compile all those sources about his "vaccines work and here's proof" article, when in the very first source of that article there is a study sourced which shows the decline of measles at an extensive rate before vaccination, and tack onto that the fact that many of these viruses have never been isolated, that the mechanism by which they work has never worked as hypothesized and I doubt there will be any logical and critical thinker who will consider vaccinations as anything but a fraud.
Like he said, the information is out there, but blindly accepting scientific fraud and arguing that doctors and scientists and everyday people haven't been alarmed by that fact for over 200 years and have published numerous studies, articles and books, gave testimony before congress and in court and even those who have been on the vaccination payroll or worked to develop them and have switched sides only to dedicate their effort and time to inform and warn people and detail the scientific fraud that vaccines have been is the tale tell sign that he has not taken the time to inform himself and so speaking about something which he has no position or perspective of.