You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Since it's now acceptable to reward yourself.
The likely hood of getting community consensus seems low to me. It also doesn't work because most Steemians have more than one account. :)
The likely hood of getting community consensus seems low to me. It also doesn't work because most Steemians have more than one account. :)
Agreed on the former. It is true that people can use alts to self vote which appears to be the case with pilgrimtraveler / explorertraveler / karengentry (I've inquired w no response). I digress. From my perspective, removing the self vote would hinder the problem albeit not fully remove it.
It may not be feasible to fully address. Scammers gonna scam.
Exactly, which is addressed in the Whitepaper along with the idea if people are abusing the system the community can flag the rewards.
We have come full circle. Nice discussion.
Right, yes flagging those posts does help; however, in the current state there isn't really a compelling incentive for people to use their voting power for that purpose.
That may be the shortfall and I think we can both agree, with the rise of controversy in regard to reward pool rape, that the flagging capability seems ill equipped to fully address the problem because it is costly for those that take it upon themselves to do it. I wonder how much this recent campaign has cost Bernie for instance. Probably a pretty penny.
I've been considering more creative solutions and I think I have one heck of an idea but it needs to be refined. I know that you likely fall on the other side of the self voting issue so I hope I am not boring or annoying you too much. :) Merry Christmas by the way!
Merry Christmas.