RE: The evolution of Adam - The dust of the ground
Traditional Christian teaching presents Jesus as reversing the effects of the Fall of Adam. However, an evolutionary view of beginnings doesn't allow for a historical Adam, making evolution seemingly incompatible with what Genesis and the apostle Paul say about him. For Christians who accept evolution and want to take the Bible seriously, this presents a faith-shaking tension.
Peter Enns, an expert in biblical interpretation, offers a way forward by explaining how this tension is caused not by the discoveries of science but by false expectations about the biblical texts. Focusing on key biblical passages in the discussion, Enns demonstrates that the author of Genesis and the apostle Paul wrote to ask and answer ancient questions for ancient people; the fact that they both speak of Adam does not determine whether Christians can accept evolution. This thought-provoking book helps readers reconcile the teachings of the Bible with the widely held evolutionary view of beginnings and will appeal to anyone interested in the Christianity-evolution debate.
https://steemfollower.com/?r=4893
Follow this link to earn more on Steemit
There is room for a historic Adam even in an evolutionary view. On simply needs to update the understanding of Adam. This does not come from a cursory reading or interpretation of biblical texts.
The perceived difficulties are not only brought about from false expectations but also from shallow, narrow and erroneous interpretations of the biblical texts in their current forms.