Okay, it's nice that he aired his views and all that. I am against any form of women violation and any form of domestic violence against either men or women. In my experience, women deliver as much domestic violence on men as men deliver on them. I have seen women hit men more times than I have seen men hit women. And when this happens, some dumb people have no issue with it. "be a gentleman" they tell d guy. However, the truth is men are less affected by the same magnitude of violence than women are. For instance, if a woman hits a man, he doesn't like it but he can handle it. If a man hits a woman tho, we expect the hospitals to show up and the BBC to bring their crew and discuss all about domestic violence. Women are naturally weaker becomes the argument. If u think so as a woman, don't be quick to hit. Let it be known that I am belligerently against anyone hitting anyone. Women seem to get a free pass on that (which is wrong) while men seem to have the world against them (which is right).
Lastly, what did he mean when he said women have more organs and so, have more purpose. That's just bullshit. Make I no start that argument. But it's like quote I saw that said women are superior to men. I think that's just patronizing. Perhaps because the interview was done on women's day.
On a final note, I am for women empowerment and women protection. But I am firmly against ideas that promote one gender over the other. From inequality arguments, we swiftly moved to women having more purpose. That seems like a dominance battle to me and not an equality issue.