You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The World's Biggest Problem (The Most Thoughtful Post You'll Read Today)
Here is my theory, and it is certainly not scientific! I believe humanity is at a turning point. I believe the Mayans NAILED it, that 2012 was then end of an era. It was the end of "being led." Or it should have been, it is not like turning a page it is a human by human realization of our right and responsibility to self govern. We do not need another leader, we must learn to lead ourselves and let others live according to their inner compass. Of course, currently most humans have turned their moral compass off and live by such solid ethics as "I'm just doing my job" and "Not my circus, not my monkeys" and other utterly useless cliches.
Yes, so many things changed after 2012. I can't imagine now country where 90%+ of people believe in their president. They lose our trust. We believe less and less.
I agree we have turned a corner, but we'll still need leaders to lead people to the understanding it takes to self govern. All gurus had master. Someone to follow and learn from. Who are some of the people leading the awakening movement? I don't know any but would love to. I think you are right, but there is a long time before we get there. First the power structure that is in place will have to change, and that could only change from within, as far as I can tell. Interesting to think about, and I hope we get there, but I feel there are a lot of roadblocks on the way that the average person will need solid leadership to forge through. Thanks for the great reply!!!!
To misquote Casteneda, to be an impeccable warrior requires that I assume everyone around me is an impeccable warrior. They must lead themselves to self governance... it could get messy but it won't work any other way.
When we were approaching the year 2012, for shits and giggles I began looking into evidence that it would be the end of the world among religions and philosophy. So, my theory is much in line with yours and is also not scientific. The 21st century is supposedly the age of Aquarius, according to astrology (take that as you will). The Age of Aquarius did not start on January 1st of 2000, but in the year 2012(ish), according to some "experts" who believe that stuff. The Age of Aquarius is an age of change and could be seen as the end of the world...as we know it. This falls in line with the Mayans who may have just gotten it by luck or had seen something or figured something out or just ran out of space. If you look back at the last 6 years...lots of change. Hell, if you look at 2008 when economies crashed and bitcoin entered the world to plant a seed for great changes, you can see that the 21st century has indeed been a time of change.
Whatever your beliefs, I think we can all agree that our world is going through a massive overhaul and we are in for a hell of a ride the next 100 years and beyond.
"Some astrologers say the Age of Aquarius actually began in 2012. That’s because they believe the star Regulus in the constellation Leo the Lion marked the ancient border between the constellations Leo and Cancer. This star moved to within 30o of the September equinox point in 2012, meaning that Regulus left the sign Leo to enter the sign Virgo in that year. Presuming equal-sized constellations in antiquity, that places the border of the constellations Pisces and Aquarius at 150o west of Regulus, or at the March equinox point. By this reckoning, the Age of Aquarius started in 2012."
)
(
Yep. The best example I can come up with is Agenda 21. In 2007 I was playing politics and working trade shows, going door to door, making cold calls - I was really playing. I was trying to educate people about the UN and Agenda 21. I was called crazy more times than I can count. In 2012 Agenda 21 was put on the GOP platform as an issue to address. That was ONE election cycle...
I am researching that now.
Sometimes, the craziest part is the reality.
Indeed. So many years, it was RIGHT THERE on the UN website and people would just refuse to look!