How much "freedom" and "rights" does a man need? Freedom is nothing more than license to indulge in vices and abnormalities; rights are merely excuses to negelct one's obligations and duties owed. The humanist drivel, for which you apologise tirelessly, is an infection no different from small pox, measles, or syphilis. Only those infected with this terminal disease would consider wallowing in their crass demands of flesh and bone to be the natural condition of humanity. Only the mentally defective terminal stage humanist invalid would elevate their fragmented, myopic, "individual" self above the identity of the group and that of humanity. Rather than acknowledging that the goals of the group and the greater race are transcendent, the humanist believes his whims to be of greater consequence. The humanist rebels against his group, humanity, nature, and God because he considers himself at the center of an imaginary universe.

Humans fall into illness, receive medical care, and return to health. Are humans also "trapped" in a cycle that they need to escape by remaining in the state of perpetual illness? You advocate using violence to "preserve" your abnormal, diseased ideology, while in the same breath condemn those who resort to force in protecting their society from the infection threatening to disintegrate their sociocultural matrix. At least those whom you threaten will die for something transcendent, your faction will die with naught but your delusions of self-grandeur.