RE: Globalism and the Hegelian Dialectic: Create the problem that encourages people to embrace the idea you want implemented.
To an ageny of chaos,
Disagreeing with your plan is not chaos.
Nice try though.
I don't advocate chaos at all. I advocate a more voluntary based form of order where NO ONE has the right to force another if they are not harming a person or their property. Very much order based.
I see a situation where certain people think they have the right to force others as agents of chaos. That can only lead to strife and disorder. It may be tolerated for awhile but it is a wheel that just keeps going around because people like you fail to learn from cycles and things done in the past and you simply wish to continue repeating the cycle.
Now if your idea of order is tyranny, oppression, and temporary obedience often coupled with a lot of death followed by a period of rebellion to that which also might have a lot of death, followed by a brief period approaching the idea of liberty until some people over time gain power and feel they have the right to control. Then the cycle repeats.
Get off the wheel.
When I said people die. That happens to those who would oppress and control others (i.e. enslave) and those who resist that. Generally one side does prevail, for a time. Yet deaths occur on each side.
If YOU or any of your kind think you have the right to FORCE me and enslave me, I'll happily die sending as many of you to an early grave as I can. If on the otherhand you let me and others make our own choices and be responsible for the outcomes of our choices, then we will let you do the same.
If you want to be a slave, and you think there is security in slavery. There is indeed security. There is just very little choice. With very little choice becomes very little advancement and ingenuity, because that would be thinking outside of the conformity you embrace.
Freedom is dangerous. I don't want freedom so I am safe. I do not need a master to protect me. I want freedom to make my own choices. It is that simple.
Tyrants and Slavers both think they are imposing order on chaos. Yet they only view it as chaos because they don't like the choices or the speech of other people that is in dissent with their own.
Live and let live is what I am stating.
Try to enslave and I'll kill as many of you fuckers as I can. ;) I also will be very sneaky as to how I do that.
At the moment no one is doing this. Yet if it comes to it I won't be going after little random people that agree with you. That is dumb. The people like myself have not begun to kill, or begun to be violent. We strongly oppose it except in defense of ourselves, our family, and our property.
As people think they can elevate some fellow human so he suddenly is perceived to have the right to impose/force rules of compliance upon others then at that point it may be time to act.
Keep on repeating the cycle if you wish. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.
I'd actually prefer you think for yourself, shake off the indoctrination, make your own choices, and learn from the past rather than selectively filtering it.
How much "freedom" and "rights" does a man need? Freedom is nothing more than license to indulge in vices and abnormalities; rights are merely excuses to negelct one's obligations and duties owed. The humanist drivel, for which you apologise tirelessly, is an infection no different from small pox, measles, or syphilis. Only those infected with this terminal disease would consider wallowing in their crass demands of flesh and bone to be the natural condition of humanity. Only the mentally defective terminal stage humanist invalid would elevate their fragmented, myopic, "individual" self above the identity of the group and that of humanity. Rather than acknowledging that the goals of the group and the greater race are transcendent, the humanist believes his whims to be of greater consequence. The humanist rebels against his group, humanity, nature, and God because he considers himself at the center of an imaginary universe.
Humans fall into illness, receive medical care, and return to health. Are humans also "trapped" in a cycle that they need to escape by remaining in the state of perpetual illness? You advocate using violence to "preserve" your abnormal, diseased ideology, while in the same breath condemn those who resort to force in protecting their society from the infection threatening to disintegrate their sociocultural matrix. At least those whom you threaten will die for something transcendent, your faction will die with naught but your delusions of self-grandeur.