RE: The Challenge of AI False Positives
Sorry for pulling Harry Potter into this but I can't help quoting here a statement by Arthur Weasely...
Never trust anything that can think for itself.
AI cannot "think" of course but the effect is the same - it simulates a human brain. Sometimes, it gives great results but mostly it's faulty and very robotic (I mean what else can you expect from a bot).
I think your assumptions about false positive results are somewhat correct. I haven't experimented enough to give further opinion on this.
Personally, I use a similar approach to yours for languages that I don't know. But for English and Urdu, I generally don't use any AI-detector. Sometimes, it's the robotic tone that gives away and sometimes it's simply the author's writing style, which in some cases I'm already familiar with, so I know when it doesn't sound like him/her.
We all need to be more open and flexible in quality control. I don't deny the kinds of scams we are facing on steem but that doesn't mean we should shut our brains and catch AI authors solely with AI detectors.
Mostly it's this. AI will always use statements that are in monotone (talking acc to my experience)
TEAM 5