How to correctly assess the quality of a post?
There is a recurring word within the "evaluations " of publications, and that is the fact of what Quality is, a word that no matter how much we try to define it will necessarily be conditioned by a personal factor in terms of tastes.
The quality of publications is a very subjective subject, since what may be considered high quality for one person may not be so for another. In addition, it may also vary depending on the context or purpose of the publication.
For example, a publication in a scientific journal must meet a very strict set of quality standards, while a publication in a personal blog may have a more informal approach and may not need to meet those same standards.
It is important to keep in mind at Steemit that quality is not always directly related to the length or complexity of a publication. A short, concise post may be of high quality if it is well-written and presents a strong argument, while a longer, more detailed post may not be of high quality if it is poorly structured or lacks coherence.
But here other aspects come in, such as: Could a 15-word post be considered quality?... is something I've been seriously thinking about. There are literary genres such as microblogging, we also have microstories, some of which can be up to 50 words or less, which for those of us who are used to writing, it could be a real challenge to shorten a publication with that length so much.
We also have another important aspect such as the images that are used, there also comes another quality issue, since a photo may be liked by a professional photographer but not by the general public. Thus, it is good to maintain consistency with the images we use and the text we share.
Photos can be a very important element in posts, as they can help illustrate a point or convey a story in a more visual and engaging way. Also, images can make a post more attractive and easy to read, but they must be well selected for this function to be fulfilled.
In short, post quality is subjective and can vary widely depending on the context and purpose of the post. The important thing is to make sure that the publication meets the appropriate standards and presents well-thought-out and well-structured content.
But I ask, do you have a personal idea of what a quality publication is? Could you share it?
TEAM 1
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted through steemcurator04. We support quality posts , good comments anywhere and any tags.Excelente tema amigo @josevas217, interesante e importante.
Los criterios para señalar un apublicacion de calidad efectivamente van a depender de quien los mire. No obstante, en la platforma steemit, el equipo de steemitblog ha considerado algunas estructuras que no todos siguen, por lo que hay discrepancias en relación a señalar que una publicación es de calidad o no.
Así mismo, el señalamiento de las imágenes, el reseñar las imágenes es una cuestión de lógica, ya que si bien puedo utilizar fotografías personales para ilustar algún post, es necesario que se haga una referencia para conectar la imágen con el contenido.
Los microblogging y microrelatos, son un género literario que está atrayendo cada vez a más seguidores, y aunque no parezca, redactar una histgoria o un microbolg con menos de 50 palabras yuna sola fotografía es relamente un reto, algo que se pudiera normatizar adecuadamente y suscribir a un género específico.
Muchas gracias por compartirlo.
Saludos
Llegando un poco atrasado a responder, entre una y otra cosa, pero procuro no dejar comentarios sin responder.
Muchas gracias por el apoyo amigo @fjjrg
últimamente he estado revisando lo de micro cuentos y micro relatos, porque es algo que se viene dando con mucha frecuencia, y hay algunos de calidad, pero hay que trabajar en no desvirtuarlo con rápido y fácil, porque no se trata de eso sino de ser concreto en el asunto.
No soy experto, lejos de eso, pero creo que puede ser interesante, en la comunidad Colombia Original hemos trabajado en algún momento ese tipo de escritos en concursos.
As is well known, there is no accounting for taste - and that is part of the assessment of quality. That makes this assessment subjective and difficult to press into a set of rules. Personally, however, I find it pleasant: we don't all like the same style of writing, the same content, the same approaches. Our understanding of "quality" is as different as we ourselves are. I don't like to laugh at flat jokes, but there are enough people who enjoy them. Instead, I love profound poems, which perhaps find few readers in general.
If a contribution stimulates a reader to sympathy, to debate or even to contradiction - it's good. It doesn't depend on the number of "likes" or the number of votes. The important thing is to touch something in someone.
Totalmente de acuerdo con usted amiga @weisser-rabe. La calidad no se puede medir por la cantidad de "votos" o de "me gusta", se trata de llegar profundamente en el corazón o el alma de alguien, quizas sean pocos, pero el llegar a las personas aecuadas es un gran logro.
Somos tan diferentes entre nosotros mismos que es inútil pretender que pensemos y evaluemos igual.
Enmi experiencia, para cada tipo de escritura hay un público definido, un público objetivo, solo hay que lograr identificarlo para poder disfrutar de la inetracción adecuada.
Un gusto leer su comentario.
Saludos.
"The important thing is to touch something in someone."
With this sentence you hit the nail on the head. It is as simple as that, and what makes a person react to something in particular is conditioned by hundreds or thousands of experiences, by study, by culture, by many things, so the valuation of "quality" will be very different.
Thank you for this contribution.
Responding late, but responding. Sometimes between one thing and another I miss some comments. And I don't like to leave unanswered.
Don't worry about - and a lot of luck for you in 2023!