Okay, I respect your opinion.
So, for example, a steemian is in club75, burns 25% and set a minimum of 10% community beneficiary concurrently, how does such person earns?
I think the burning will rather affect your club status negatively, since the burned steem could have been used to power up instead.

Note: the example I used is just a case study, and besides we agree to disagree.

Steemians are expected to build themselves, together with the various communities and this can only be achieved through power ups and good content production.
We need to consider things from different angles.
Have you considered the effects of the burning on newbies?

Maybe you can stand it, the idea will scare others, although it may be portray as optional.

You made mention of how some platforms are utilizing the burning mechanism to improve their projects, but mind you, those platforms are not into clubs, therefore our mode of burning is the criteria to join either clubs, which is way higher than 25%, and contribute to the steem ecosystem.

To me, even if this proposal is embraced by mear steemians like us, it will have no effect on the price of steem, since the big guys control the market. Therefore this idea will only work, if the whales together with the Steemit Team employ the burning mechanism.

We want the betterment of the Steem ecosystem, but if care is not taken and we decide to hastely implement some unpleasant measures, the case will be vice versa of the expectation.

Thanks for the response, dear.