RE: Proposal for a White Paper on Support for Artistic Creation (EN, ES)
I really appreciate you input and thank you for your time. Maybe it doesn't look so, but I do understand the complexities of dealing with people in all kinds of environments. In my life, I had the chance to manage groups of up to fifteen hundred with all the good and bad that comes with it. I also try to always do the right thing, as there is really no point in doing it in any other fashion.
If the others choose to misunderstand or fight my positions it's usually their loss, not mine, because I finish what I start, and I don't care for empires of the mind and am absoletely impervious to negativity. Since my days as an Officer in our Marine Corps, I have learned and practiced the way to go through very fast OODA loops, so, I'm usually one step ahead in eveything I do. If, at any point I feel it to be a loosing proposition, I just drop it, as I don't invest time in low probability outcomes. For now, I think that this is worth the effort and I still think that criteria must be set for this, as it doesn't make sense that everybody depends on the charity of a single individual or even a couple of them. Organization, clear rules and transparency are needed for such a project to get wider support.
Also, I didn't start anything yet and just made a proposal to develop a framework, and that, needs to be community based, even though some, may or may not use AI to help them consider what to contribute, I don't feel it to be my part to limit that, as long as the input is valid and helps this move forward.
In the end, there will be a project and I'm not planning to be leading it, as I expect that during this process of the white book procedures, someone to show up that demonstrates to the others that they have the characteristics, time and state of mind to lead this, and, still, won't be taking any lonely decisions because I don't like dictatorships. In a global and free enviroment like this, no one is entitled to act alone.
Also, the number commentator 12129 is me.
Happy carnaval monday,
Pedro
Thank you.
Maybe I took the wrong number. I don't like these number accounts when they are speaking. Speak as Hefestus but not in the name of a whole community. I don't like community fences at all. Group formation is always a manifestation of demarcation and typically human petty-mindedness. But it is a good move to make more money. So I will think about a group for all the selfempowered amphibians on blockchain. Then I will earn more rewards.
Don't worry! It's just carnival here in Hanau. In carnival you can tell the truth.
0.00 SBD,
0.01 STEEM,
0.01 SP
You can always tell the truth, froggy... You may or may not like the consequences, but that is just what life is.
Carnaval here too, so, anything is possible because we're wearing masks that reveal ourselves.
0.00 SBD,
0.20 STEEM,
0.20 SP
Hi friend. I'm wearing a frog mask!
0.00 SBD,
0.01 STEEM,
0.01 SP
And, it's an excellent one, that does reveal you in many interesting ways.
Cheers.
0.00 SBD,
0.20 STEEM,
0.20 SP
Pardon,
first I asked Perplexity but it didn't know.
What are very fast OOPA cycles?
Es steht auf Wikipedia. Sehen:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/OODA-Loop
0.00 SBD,
0.18 STEEM,
0.18 SP
Ach du liebes Lottchen. Das sag ich dem armen Bot!!!
0.00 SBD,
0.01 STEEM,
0.01 SP
lol
Sorry. Too much threads. But I recorded the answers of the bot. Already writing about.
0.00 SBD,
0.01 STEEM,
0.01 SP
Yes... Lot's of threads. Write a post about this, please. I'd really enjoy reading it.
Have an excellent Carnaval!
Thank you. I wrote last night and collected the documents of timeline. I have it all. But there was no time today to go on. It will come soon.
0.00 SBD,
0.01 STEEM,
0.01 SP
There's no hurry.
Thanks for calling this to my attention.
0.00 SBD,
0.17 STEEM,
0.17 SP
I will write a full article on it, but basically it's a model for combat decision first developed by an airman called John Boyd, and it means Observar, Orientar, Processar, Agir. That's portuguese, in English, I believe it is known as an OODA loop, Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. and these are the four steps towards combat decision, once you finish the Act phase, you go back to the first step. Usually, especially in air combat, where the model was first developed, the one further ahead in the cycle and with the fastest cycling through the phases will win the combat. It is a model that you can apply to decisions in any kind of dynamic situations and it's a very effective way to go around business decisions or decisions in any kind of project you are developing.
Actually, I believe I will change the text for the English designation, as it may be easier to search online.
Thank you for the explanation.
Very interesting: Perlexity doesn't know anything about OODA. But it want to know, what it means. Do you want to give him (the robot) your excellent answer or should I do it. Maybe you want to keep this AI as stupid as possible.
0.00 SBD,
0.01 STEEM,
0.01 SP
I would rather feed it my next article on the #ty-tyxhefestus series, as it will broadly explain what OOPA, or OODA cycles are.
I believe Perplexity can wait a few more days for that.
0.00 SBD,
0.18 STEEM,
0.18 SP
After I fed this AI bastard with your Wikipedia link, it denied having failed before. I am deeply disappointed.
It takes patience. It's only learning.
You're right. But it lies.
0.00 SBD,
0.01 STEEM,
0.01 SP
It does. Is that subterfuge a sign of intelligence? And can you punish it for lying, like you do to a child?