You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: "SLC21/WK2: Mastering CPR | A Comprehensive Guide to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation"
Student Name: @xkool24
Overall Grade: 7.6/10
Plagiarism Check: Pass
AI Use: No
Question | What the Student Did Well | Areas for Improvement | Grading |
---|---|---|---|
Question 1 | The student provided a clear, step-by-step explanation of CPR with DRABC protocol on a mannequin, including proper hand placement, compression depth, and timing/rate. According to the question, the use of images enhanced the understanding of their practice and sharing knowledge with peers. | While the explanation was detailed, the student could have added the checking for a pulse (important aspect before opting for CPR), maintaining a safe environment (an important component of DRABC) and understanding possible complications like rib fractures during CPR. Including these points would give a more comprehensive view of real-life challenges during CPR. | 1.7/2 |
Question 2 | The student mentioned modifications for performing CPR on pregnant women, obese individuals, and elderly patients, highlighting changes in positioning, compression depth, and ventilation. The explanations reflected a solid understanding of adapting CPR to different body types and conditions, the chart format is a good approach to clearly mentioning the differences. | Although the importance of early defibrillator use in these scenarios and mentioning tools like mechanical chest compressors for better support should be added to the context for better understanding. | 1.8/2 |
Question 3 | The student perfectly described common mistakes in CPR, such as improper hand positioning, insufficient compression depth, and not maintaining a steady compression rate. | The explanation covered a variety of typical errors and their consequences. But the question was write the explanation of all the mistakes people do while doing CPR, this question include both aspects why these acts are categorized as mistakes, like why the speed should be 100-120 compressions/min, why it can’t be done on a slower of faster rate and second aspect why people do such mistakes, how can be these avoided? Student didn’t focus on any of them. Student has only highlighted the few mistakes (not all, that were mentioned in the module), but the explanation why are these called mistakes is not mentioned in the homework. | 1.2/2 |
Question 4 | The student developed a good and complete layout for CPR awareness campaign, clearly identifying the targeted audience, key messages, and the use of social media and other media platforms. The timeline is organized and doable, showing a strong approach to spreading awareness. | To improve, the campaign could focus more on partnerships with local healthcare providers or first aid trainers to enhance training events. A clear detail on budget and resource allocation would’ve strengthened the plan. | 1.7/2 |
Question 5 | The student created an engaging and clear infographic summarizing CPR steps for different age groups. The use of Canva enhanced its visual appeal, and the steps were easy to follow. | The infographic could be improved by adding more specific scenarios where CPR is necessary, such as its not during drowning or during trauma or during electric shock, but after drowning when one has been brought to land. A clearer distinction between the CPR steps for adults, children, and infants would help avoid confusion, here same steps are copied and pasted in each box. Improving the contrast in design could enhance readability, all blue is not attracting as it should be. | 1.2/2 |
General Feedback:
The student demonstrates a solid understanding of CPR techniques and applications across diverse scenarios. Further improvement in providing detailed explanations and practical solutions in certain areas would greatly enhance the overall quality of the responses. Overall, good effort and attention to CPR nuances.
Regards,
@abdu.navi03