RE: Comparing Clif High to a real truth teller - one calls out the truth and the other conceals it - you guess which is which..
The problem comes about similar to when you talk to flat earth and ball earth people. One can go on and on about how NASA has lied, and the other can go on and on about why NASA wouldn't lie.
The reality is they are both wrong. But they will never know until something so different as to be insane impinges on their consciousness.
They each have a list of reasons. (all that time in space and only two pictures of the earth? Why do we need to know about great arcs in order to navigate.)
Clif High has lots of knowledge, but really is only personally knowledgeable in the computer sciences. The amount he has read and remembers dwarfs that of almost every other person. And so he has knowledge and an opinion on everything.
As for his predictive abilities, they are quite excellent. Especially if you go past the headline. Its like, everyone shouts that clif high said that bitcoin is going to $100,000 before December. But, that isn't really what he said. He said that there are indicators that show $100k parties. And they cluster around these temporal markers. And it is important to note that these temporal markers are like a rubber ruler. Trying to line them up with the calendar will always give you varying results.
On the woo-woo stuff, he has a lot of light level experience. But, he has no deep experiences. For an example, listen to Clif explain something woo-woo, and then go read Carlos Casteneda.
Regarding NASA, I can only say that they are filled top to bottom with Freemasons and that if you explore their publicly released materials it is filled with lies, bigger lies, and more lies. This is regardless of the "shape of the Earth" discussion. We certainly did not go to the Moon and we are not going to Mars either. NASA scientists are on video admitting that they lost the technology of how to get past the Van Allen radiation belts.. oh please!
Clif High has an excellent memory on a lot of topics and is incredibly confident in anything he says, even when it's completely and utterly wrong. This makes people trust that he knows what he is talking about on every topic.. and not just computer science. I don't deny that Clif is likely a very skilled programmer, but a genius on every topic? No way. Clif just regurgitates a hell of a lot of information that he has collected and much of his vast woo woo hypotheses could be cut down in minutes if an interviewer was willing and able to really challenge him and Clif would actually respond to it. Clif will not allow himself to be cornered like that. Clif would just throw a bunch of arcane questions back to confuse the interviewer. I've seen him do this a number of times already.
Let's take another recent example. Clif came out in an interview and claimed that Rife technology doesn't work because they found that each person requires his own signature frequency. He then made a plug for Scenar technology being the same thing but better. This is total lie! Either he is talking fully out of his ass because he doesn't understand the technology or it is purposeful disinformation. Either way, it's bad and a very clear sign that he can't be fully trusted.
I also suggest that you go have a look at Clif's much older Web bot reports. The ones that talked about a great coastal event that was just about to happen for about ten years. Now compare that to his newer ice age BS and planes that will be frozen in mid-flight and that this is just around the corner. This is just more of the same tired "end of the world" predictions from Clif while he ignores everything else of import going on in the world vis-à-vis the NWO. Also take all his metals predictions. He was calling for $100,000 gold just a year ago with Greg Hunter, now gold is going the way of the dinosaur. He changes his tune whenever it's convenient and his many past failures just fall into a memory hole that everyone ignores.
The thing is that the world has changed.
Before cryptos, everyone who wanted for honest money was usually in the gold-standard corner.
After cryptos, gold is not even a close second for that "gold-standard" that people really want.
But, how could you talk about cryptos more than a dozen years ago?
And thus, if Clif High was actually do accurate predictions, it would be just as you described them. They would change over time. After we passed 2012, there was no need for an Armageddon reset. And all those prophecies of the end times are voided.
I like Mike Hoagland's explanations of NASA better. As in there is actually 3 groups running NASA. One of them is the freemasons. And NASA puts out a lot of truth. If it was all lies, it would be so easy to just dismiss NASA, But, every lie has to have a grain of truth. And so, we are left with a problem, how would we prove anything?
If you wanted to talk cryptos ten years ago, you could have talked digital money. Lots of people were talking about digital money even 20 years ago. They had chips on cards at that point with digital money stored only on the cards..
Regarding Clif's predictions, we are in the realm of supposition now. Your logic is justifying Clif's failed results based upon potential planetary timeline changes rather than objective facts of whether he was right or wrong in his predictions. I'm just saying he's been very wrong.. and a lot.
Regarding Richard Hoagland, I have to respectfully disagree. Hoagland has been discredited so many times that you can find plenty on this if you are willing to look closely. There was a hell of lot of very ugly stories about Hoagland that came out where he was outed as scamming people, plagiarizing people, and running many more complex deceptions and cons.
I'm not sure every lie has a grain of truth. There are ways to prove things, but the question is whether you can trust the people that claim they have proved them. I just know that if I get enough lies and disinformation from any source, I don't trust them anymore. This includes NASA, Clif, and loads of other official sources. Who you can therefore trust becomes a more difficult question in a time of what is essentially universal deceit. The ability to properly discern truth from deception then becomes the key skill set that everyone needs to develop for themselves.
Actually, it is because i have a lot of experience with predictions.
Reading the future is a very iffy thing.
As in, there are futureS, not a single future.
Further, if there is an accident is someone's future, telling them to avoid that accident doesn't work, because the accident will find them, wherever they are, whatever they do. It is an energetic thing, and thus, to untie the person from the accident, you have to change what they are attracting, what they are currently being.
So, i say the earth's future has seriously changed over the last two decades. And thus, anyone who is truly doing predictions, if they are being honest, would have their story change over the last two decades.
This may be the case, and it could be a reason why Clif has been inaccurate. Whether this makes Clif more palatable as a trusted information source is a different question. I thoroughly believe that Clif has an agenda whether ever stated or not. There are too many weird coincidences and connections with Clif that can no longer be ignored from my perspective. This means that any information you get from Clif may very well be manipulated according to this agenda even if the Web bot actually exists and is feeding him somewhat accurate information - in other words, every effective trap has to have some decent bait..