It's always excellent to see judges do their job and call out bad behavior for what it is. There needs to be more of that.
I'm wondering if CPS gets paid on the back end through reimbursements by the government based on how many children are removed? I know in the United States the Division of Child Support gets such reimbursements/matching funds based on the amount of child support they collect.
The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA) signed by Bill Clinton and a brainchild of HIllary's, commoditized children by offering an incentive to the CPS worker of $4,000 per child adopted out of the foster care system with an additional of bonus $2000 for special needs children put into adoption. The parental rights of the birth parents could be severed within 2 years in the system turning the children into orphans. Given recent events, it should be obvious what the Clintons were trying to do.
ASFA is still on the books. Texas CPS went through a major cuckolding a couple of years ago and the legislature is still trying to overhaul and reorganize.
Also watch Nancy Schaefer videos. There is a theory that she was assassinated for speaking out against CPS.
That makes sense. Otherwise it doesn't seem normal for agencies to out of there way to create problems where perhaps none exits, unless there was some sort of compensation behind it all.