I have linked there peer reviewed scientific papers backing my logic. You can't argue against that by words, you need to provide sufficient scientific counter-evidence if you want to be taken seriously.

Even if you say that LN is good, which I don't necessarily hate, but I hate the idea that it's forced on us.

Bitcoin Cash can also implement LN if they want to, and probably will in the future, mostly to help out faucets and micro-businesses, that have a lot of automated transactions.

The difference is that BCH doesn't force you to use LN though high fees. In BCH every transaction can have it's place in the blockchain, and only use LN for automated transactions with many input/output.

So this is the correct way of scaling, you give people access to the decentralized blockchain, but also add these "plugins" for special users.

Bitcoin Core wants to force you to use their tech, and essentially create a permission based Bitcoin.

I have no fundamental problem with 3rd party solutions, it's just that they should not be forced on us, if there is somebody that wants to use them, it's fine.