Technology & Our Ability To Read
In a recent discussion of Internet usage, a controversial issue has been whether Google is stifling the human brain. On the one hand, some argue that technology made it easier for people to access more information. From this perspective, the internet will save time for the student to get more resources for assignment and research in school and that it's also accompanied humans with their daily life tasks. On the other hand, however, other argue that the more technology advanced, the more student will get distracted by it, and the more human will depend on it instead of using the natural power of their memory. In the words of Nicholas Carr, one of this view’s leading proponents, “what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation” (125). According to this view, the internet is making it hard on the human brain to stay focus when reading and limiting their brain capacity. In sum, then, the issue is whether we should worry about internet usage or not. Although the web is helping users with getting their needs, it was decreasing the brain's ability and interest to read and stay focus on a particular passage.
The technology was founded for the purpose of simplifying human tasks. For example, companies used to had people to hand-write all the data about the company and employee information which works there, but with the computer now they could store everything simpler than before and less detailed. So, in this sample, they would only fill in the blank what it’s necessary since the computer had already all the basic information that needed. In that case, we allowed the computer to think for us instead of using our mind and body to do the work, and that’s what Carr’s talks about in his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” where we entrust the work to the machines. Therefore, technology giving our brain a break from thinking and that break might shut down the mind in the long run.
The Internet is doing all the job that need to be done. As a student, reading is the big piece in the whole process of learning, and that what some class requires them to do. So, to write a reflection paper for a book that needs to be read; the student would go on The Web to get all the information they require briefly for that particular paper instead of going all the way to read the whole book to complete that paper. And the reason behind is when they try to read that specific book they will feel bored after seconds from starting, and their mind will drift away to another thing that seems to them more interesting than what they are doing. So, they would resort to the internet to ease their task and save time to do the paper faster so that then they could go back again to technology to satisfy their desire. The same thing here is happing with Carr, where when he tries to read a particular book; his mind would start to look for something else to do that naturally require less reading and words to focus on.
Humans resort to technology to get their work done simply and briefly with less time to spend on and that giving the brainless time to think and slowing the ability to be creative. But getting more deeply in that process; it seems that Google is the tool that most people use to get their work done so that that they could go back again to it for other technological machines following the think that looks more appealing to them. Therefore it’s a back and forth process where we use technology and The Web to get back to the same machine but for other purposes and uses. So, that what it even accelerate and increase the time for the brain to stay in a temporary coma from thinking until a person decides to use what shall be called his creativity with work again.
Thanks for reading :)
Good article, @pinkisland and interesting opinion. You are absolutely right about Google and our creativity. But what do you think about paper books? Many people say that we should continue reading them. I liked to read very much. But I can not force myself to read one...
Personally, I can't read on windows. It annoys me some time because I would be spending hours to read a book online and that hurts my eyes. My eyes start seeing a white light, and I fear I might get blind because of focusing on the screen. Other people might love to read online since they feel more conformable and some like paper book. It depends on individuals taste I believe.
I agree with you it is individual. Last ten years I used to read more information than just books, that is why I don't even see well the letters in paper books...Anyway, thank you interesting thoughts.
Thank you for reading it and sharing your thought.
There are tools available to screen out the distractions.
Readability is one example
There are also tools available to enhance the reading experience.
SpeedReader
for example. Reading at speeds of six hundred words per minute are not uncommon.
Note: I read at about twice that speed, and 'scan' much faster yet. Reading can be expensive. I'm so glad that there is so much free content. Oddly enough I'm also a writer and as such find it necessary to do research. I've always been curious about almost everything. I had a college library card when I was a preteen. NOW I can find stuff, have it read, digested and summarized before I could even look it up in the Dewey Decimal Card Catalog back then.
I can't understand why anyone is upset? They would complain if they were hung with a new rope. (old saying)
Great article. Even in college, many religious professors would require that half our sources were "print sources". I'm 28 so it was not long ago. I am very happy they required this. I learned to appreciate the research more. Instead of looking up "key words" I would check the index of the print book and would actually end of reading more of it. Did it lead to a better research paper?.... I think so. At the very least, it lead to more inspiration which made me more excited about the papers in general. Another point that was not raised as much in this article is what text you will find. For instance, some of the books I was reading are from the 1920s or earlier. Now could I find those on the Internet...maybe. However, I doubt with key word searches those would be the top on the search engine. Those resources... "the primary" resources can be the most helpful when doing true research. The last series I published on here was almost all print sources on polygamy. More than half of the sources on Gandhi (just released part 1 today) is from old school "print" books.
It's absolutely true. For example, I could barely keep reading after the first paragraph. That's why, I think, posts with a lot of pics are better received than those without. Also, I'm now reading at home Marcel Proust books, one of the most demanding work of fiction you'll ever find! and it's not an easy task to labour through one thick page of compact prose after another.
Awesome. Are you aware of any special reading devices for those in need of reading assistance, such as these glasses for the blind?