And if we play war?

Two historical opponents who, by assuming world power, play the war with the clear objective of sharing markets without caring about anything in return, they are not worth the decisions of the United Nations Security Council and the consequences of the war are much less important: children killed, wounded or vulnerable, whole families destroyed, homes finished after so much effort to achieve it, deterioration of biodiversity, highly polluting agents scattered by each bomb or missile.

As the picture is discouraging, China, another world power, has only its own interests in the world market: placing its merchandise is its only interest; the war is presented to the great powers as a business opportunity that allows the reactivation of the armament industry macro-industry and once destroyed what is left behind, they will come with their multinational companies to rebuild the country.

Nothing is said of the chemical weapons that threatened the world in Iraq, and that they never managed to achieve since everything was a screen for the energy interests of the great powers, regardless of their consequences; for days we listened to the President of the USA Donald Trump saying the same thing about Syria and remembered the words of President George W.Bush in 2002, they were almost the same words for different characters, making similar decisions in the same oval Hall of the White House 16 years later

Peace has become a dreamed utopia, how much we want a world without wars, a world where we can live in perfect harmony with nature, where the borders only separate us from neighboring territories but that each day we are more united and in perfect harmony as There are animal and plant species in nature. We can not stop insisting on the need for a better world, where we can live in perfect harmony with nature, what some of us call a culture of love for nature "Culturaleza"