By all means, ask more and we'll all learn more!

I for one have not read L Neil Smith or Paul Rosenberg, although I'm pretty sure I've heard the latter speak at some point. The Probability Approach does seem to contain some similar ideas, but I'm not gonna say they are exactly the same since I've not read it.

As an anarcho-capitalist ('voluntaryist' if you rather use that and I'm sure we're pretty much on the same page, although I find the meaning to be ambigious sometimes) the only agreements I support enforcing are contractual and based on property rights. That kind of government – not a state, but voluntary for all that don't agress – that can uphold ethics, will not come into being unless we make an organized – not "centralized" – effort.

That's what the cooperatives/individuals contracting with eachother is about. The better products and contracts we can establish, the better society can be made from that point on. It's all about establishing better institutions than the ones we have right now.

So yes, Ethereum and EOS are perfect (insofar as they work) examples of this mode of thinking. They enable more freedom, greater stability and will end up transforming the world as we know it; Rather than relying on going through the established political institutions, we are instead amending the culture that they operate in, by means of technological and organisational breakthrough.

And it's working. This is why you'll see more and more governments and big banking organisations start to mimic and take after what we are doing right here. Soon, just like companies in a free market enviroment, they must be enough like us, or their "customers" start to rebell –– either by avoiding their wealth traps, or by violently kicking them out.