RT.com removed my comment stating Julian Assange is CIA twice in a row.

in #wikileaks7 years ago (edited)

After I read an article on rt.com about the Catalonian referendum I posted two comments.
One comment was a reaction to someone who asked why Google cooperated with authorities in Spain to hide websites that promote and or facilitate the planned referendum. I replied that Google abides by the law and if they don't they can't operate in that country(legally).
So far so good.

In an other comment I replied to some comments that were discussing whether Assange and Wikileaks is a CIA operation or if he is legit.
I commented that IMO Assange/Wikileaks is a CIA front because he was promoted in the main stream media, even before he had any leaks to publish. Main story in the news world wide, just to inform the public that Wikileaks existed and was going to facilitate leaking documents not meant for publication.
Real whistle blowers are never mentioned in the MSM. Maybe a short report in the local news when they are found(potentially with their family dead also) with 2 bullets to the back of their head, no weapon found, and deemed a suicide. But Assange was promoted even before he had any leaks.
That right there is a tell tale sign he is not your average whistle blower.

Then, among the first leaks that he published and went viral(again media promotion), came that video from an AH-64 Apache attack helicopter over Baghdad blowing some reporters to shreds in the middle of the city. They misidentified the camera gear for weapons.
That went around the world, and caused some critique for the US military. And while the video of the killing was new, the incident itself wasn't. It was publicly known and admitted by the US military and they were denounced for it. Of course a video has more impact then a written report, and it caused a stronger reaction then the written report which wasn't publicized at all. The video went viral, so again we see the MSM building up Assange's reputation.
I think it was a calculated release directed by the CIA, tell nothing new, but provide video and show it around the world. All to build the credibility and familiarity of Wikileaks with the general public.

Also Assange fails the litmus test about 9/11. He buys the official story.

Now that being said, he might not even be aware of it his role and who is pulling his strings. There are indications that he might be a victim of mind control programming(MK-Ultra). Also I recently saw some reports about Jullian Assange having some kind of relationship with Pamela Anderson who regularly visits him in the Ecuadorian embassy. Although I have no indication that Anderson is also a MK-Ultra mind control victim I wouldn't be surprised at all. For her, kind of, predecessor, Anna Nicole Smith, there definitely were indications that she was a victim of mind control. With multiple personalities all programmed by her handler. And it is said that these programmed persons are also used to deliver highly secure messages, they don't even know it themselves that an other personality of them is carrying a secret message. They also have enabled photographic memory, so nothing needs to be written down. When they arrive at the intended destination for the message that person must trigger the personality which hold the messages. And after it is relayed they go back to their daily personality.

His youth is sketchy and unverifiable over periods. Some people suspect he spent part of his youth in a community/sect that was called "The Family." It had all the characteristics of being a MK-Ultra style programming operation. Also the sentences the lead organizers got raised questions(ridiculously low) but would be expected if it was a operation run by an intelligence agency.

So after about half an hour after posting the comment I checked the comment section again, opened and loaded all comments, but to my surprise I could not find the comment I described above. Only the one consisting of one sentence about Google abiding by the Spanish law. So I took the effort to retype my lost comment and posted it. And again I never saw it in the comment section. I opened all comments and used the search option in my browser, looked through the comments myself to see if I could find it. But i can only locate one of my comments as I mentioned above.
It did one thing though, it grew the probability in my perception that he indeed is a CIA operative.

The video below delves deeper into his suspected connections with intelligence agencies and the possibility that he is a mind control victim.

Sort:  

When I have though out a possible theory/scenario I always try to poke holes in it and think of other possibilities. And usually I end up with various possibilities, often with different degrees of likelihood and sometimes, when there isn't much info to go by, more or less equal probability.

In the story I laid out in my post I tend to think the most probable reason for my comment not showing up is that my text contained a word that triggered some kind of censorbot to remove my comment. Or maybe it triggered moderation of the comment before it will be published. Although I'm not aware that the rt.com comment section does pre moderate comments.

An other possible scenario is that the reason to censor my comment is to prevent people claiming or suggesting/theorizing, and thereby suppressing the idea, that Wikileaks is a CIA front.
And Assange is a mind control victim.

When someone is isolated, for years confined in a small space, acccused of crimes he hasn't commtitted, his network and people potentially compromised, it is a possibility.

If hat's the case, one could reason that the demcroatic party leaks were designed to give the current president a chance to be elected.

Ramifications would significant. Howevr, I am not drawing a decisive conclusion - as I believe there are vital data missing to make an assessesment that is not manipulated.


Ahhh - watching vid now...

Luckily you can post here just about anything.

This post has received a 0.77 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @markush.

Genesis 3:1 King James Version (KJV)

3 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

Congratulations @b-free! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of comments
Award for the number of upvotes

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.16
JST 0.029
BTC 62284.56
ETH 2424.79
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.58