RE: Why did @surpassinggoogle giving TRIPLICATE POSTS the same UPVOTE?
Hahaha you are so funny. You stress alot. It doesn't matter to me those stats. I know how much i do, i don't have to speak about it. Stats reflects nothing much. I have been here for long and i know stats are limited cos what's rewarded is value and a ton of value is created behind the scenes. As for sleep, i don't sleep in a day. I haven't mentioned any times i vote. curation takes different forms and i curate very differently. i dont look at content alone. i know these people and they know and the brotherhood is all that count. Sometimes i am rewarding content, i rewarding value which may not have been dont on steemit. it can also vote in a bid to encourage. it can be a newbie and the post may have flaws but i vote still and there is a reason. if you want to know the extent of curation, look at the level of comments i make or i have made ever since and before delegation. look out #untalented developing 2500 comments in a few weeks and i vote comment. Look at how many comments i have voted as opposed to posts. and that post didnt matter too me much. i have been on steemit for long enough to know how things work, so i dont do much of those things. i dont react to things. If its an error, no stress. People have done posts and divided the numbers. Overall, it really doesnt matter. Everyone can do his own stats. My style is different. I sift even the not-so-good to find good in it. i am not out to impress. I love people and these people know it. I am in the chats with them for hours in a day speaking about life. I am boy, who does suffering. 24/7 pains yet i dont sleep and look at my posts. Speaking of curation. See how many comments they generate and see how many i vote on and read the type of comments on these posts or all around steemit where i have been mentioned and read it and you can measure my curation efforts using that. Steemit and life is beyond all these things. Normally, i wont respond but i respond in a bid to teach, cos you have been persistent with these things. I have a steemgigs community too and the steemgigs interface in the making, #untalented being a branch of steemgigs, not the mention the ton of things i have done from day one on steemit. I know community etc and i know the communities i cater to and how they work. There expectations from the internet and they tiny things that can crush their spirit and all these things i take into account. I know of the impact of interaction and i know how the number is increasing and how i have to spread votes to sustain them overtime. It is about value for me. So sometimes a best post can have a small vote still, while i spread the rest of the votes through the comment threads to teach, the need for authors themselves to interact and spread unity as more people from other communities come around and i vote on them, to spread votes cos community wasnt created to stir isolation but to bring about steemit growth inside out. my vote pattern is done to stir steemit growth and create a vibe on the inside that make it a home. i am keen on the human behind the steemian, even more than content. Anyone can write the best content. but there is a reputation model too. Among other things, though its a blockchain their is privacy element to it. There are approaches when you produce data especially when you lead, but paulag is new and may not know the approach, so her approach may not be your approach neither will it be mine cos i or you may know more things or perhaps we are just different. i am fans of everyone, even brother. i dont just do curation. i do a ton, a whole ton. yesterday, i was in a video call to speak in a steemit event. and my posts alone, generate comments and i vote on all, so speaking of curation, look at those and the vibe in the comments and the number of comments i make and yes, i am on steemit almost 24 hours and the people who know, know. i didnt even know about paulag's post, becos it doesnt matter to me those stats. several steemians visited me in the chats to tell me. i am a fan and brother to all the other delegatees and the reason delegation was removed is all just speculation. I am after steemit growth inside out and that is the path my curation went. Paulag is an adult. Overall, anyone can make mistakes and the next step is to loving teach.
If you want to have some grasp into what i am saying. you can see this post and see how many comments are on it and read the comments. Everyone has different approaches to things and the stats dont move me because i do have more knowledge about how steem and steemit works and alot of value is created behind the scenes then rewarded on the scenes. so i am never one to see stats on steem and bother to question adults. They know what value they create and i know what value i create. I am the same person from before delegation. Steemgigs started before delegation. the ceo of busy delegated to steemgigs before delegation. my witness was ongoing before delegation. my communities have been ongoing since day one.
This is something i never do but i did it because of your persistence and in a bid to lovingly teach.
and the calculation you are looking for is 19k divided by 77 days
Yes, @pualag made mistake, but she never admitted. She used these wrong data to jump to silly conclusions. Therefore I asked her to check all her data, and correct all her data, before she wrote those silly conclusions.
That's the point, man.