Demographics and the Anti-White "Liberty" Movement

Libertarians, anarchists, and Voluntaryists are great on issues where it is obvious that individuals are trespassed against, like taxation and central banking. In accordance with private property norms, taxation and central banking constitute institutionalized trespass and are thus incompatible with self-ownership and the non-aggression principle.

Unfortunately, these same groups of people falter when it comes to explaining the state's impact on entire groups of people because they imagine that individualism precludes the factual validity of statistics and heuristic analysis. Indeed, when presented with an irrefutable demographic fact, such as blacks committing a disproportionately high number of violent crimes relative to their representation in the general population, "liberty" minded folks become tactical nihilists and skeptics, often forgetting that anecdotes aren't arguments and that exceptions are only notable because they prove the rule.

When it is pointed out to these people that white Americans are the greatest net victims of American domestic policy as a group by virtue of the fact that they bear the highest tax burden and are forced to subsidize the inclusion of third world welfare shoppers who are hostile to their culture and way of life, libertarians and anarchists conveniently forget that they are supposed to be opposed to taxation and forcing people to do things without consent. To them, generalizations are a greater evil than the government-facilitated ethnocide of "privileged" groups -- a position that makes them functionally equivalent to social justice warriors.

Some even categorize generalizations and pro-white advocacy as a violation of the non-aggression principle, though they certainly don't apply that general criticism of generalizations to itself.

They likewise forget their arguments for the privatization of roads and emergency services. In any context other than the production of territorial defense, libertarians and anarchists will be the first to tell you that taxation is theft and that services currently monopolized by the government could be produced more effectively by private companies. Unfortunately, this all goes out the window the moment we start talking about the government's manipulation of demographics through immigration and welfare policy.

According to them, it's okay to use roads, emergency services, welfare, or any other government service because they claim that these services would be provided anyway absent the state. I agree that these services would exist absent the state, but they don't apply this standard to the production of territorial defense because borders and deportations can only be produced by the state (apparently). It's rather ironic that their argument against the deportation of uninvited trespassers and border enforcement is the same one normies use against the private production of roads.

Because taxation is theft yet the victims thereof have no restitutive claim to that which was obtained with the stolen loot despite the fact that its purchasing power has been destroyed, or so they claim. Jeez, what an appealing philosophy. "Taxation is theft and the victims thereof are shit out of luck!" I can't imagine why voluntaryism hasn't gone viral and replaced mixed market socialism as the preferred mode of social organization.

But I digress.

What follows is a typical interaction with one of these ardent defenders of anti-white extremism:

Me: "Here's a list of fourteen government policies that are intended to destroy white communities and diminish white birth rates, which are now below the rate of replenishment. These policies should be stopped because they constitute a form of slow demographic genocide."

Anarchists / Lolbergs: "You just hate race mixing!"

Me: "I'm not a proponent of race mixing but race mixing isn't part of my argument."

Anarchists / Lolbergs: "You're just mad because white women don't like you!"

Me: "I'm happily engaged to a hwite woman whomst I've been with for six years but that has nothing to do with my argument."

Anarchists / Lolbergs: "You just can't get laid!"

Me: "I'm a proud father but that has nothing to do with my argument."

Anarchists / Lolbergs: "You're just a misogynist!"

Me: "It's true that I don't care what women who aren't my fiance think but that has nothing to do with my argument."

Anarchists / Lolbergs: "You're just an anti-Semite!"

Me: "I'm definitely critical of Jewish influence in matters of statecraft -- especially with regard to their advocacy of the fourteen aforementioned policies -- but that's entirely peripheral to my argument."

Anarchists / Lolbergs: "You're just a racist!"

Me: "I certainly wouldn't deny that the genetic and biological distinctions between races aren't limited to skin color and that, on average, different racial groups demonstrate different propensities and levels of respect for the peaceful and productive way of life that exists in my community, but that has nothing to do with my argument."

Anarchists / Lolbergs: "You're just a bad person!"

Me: "And you're just coming up with excuses for state policies and demographic genocide. Are you somehow benefiting from the status quo?"

Anarchists / Lolbergs: "REEEEEEEEEE!"

They don't even bother to argue that these public policies don't exist; they simply object to characterizing their existence as ethnocide. Instead, they take a page out of Saul Alinsky's book and ridicule anyone with enough testicular fortitude to breach the topic in public. As for me, I'll stop talking about the ethnocide of white people when the government no longer:

1. Cages white people in white countries for refusing to pay taxes.
2. Takes pro-white advocates as political prisoners.
3. Prohibits self-determinism in white countries.
4. Prohibits defense against invasion in white countries.
5. Legally protects anti-white discrimination in white countries.
6. Prohibits white people from discriminating.
7. Imports and subsidizes the birth rates of non-white latecomers.
8. Forces white people to associate with non-whites.
9. Teaches ethno-masochism to white children in public schools and colleges.
10. Terrorizes white children with falsified climate data for the purpose of discouraging reproduction in white communities.
11. Subsidizes anti-white media outlets like NPR.
12. Forces white people to pay the healthcare, food, clothing, housing, energy, and educations costs of non-whites.
13. Legally protects non-white criminals who trespass in white countries.
14. Sells unborn white children into transgenerational debt to pay for everything they can't collect from white people in taxes.

In the meantime, I'm going to take Joe Biden at his word when he says the objective of the left is to make white people an absolute minority in white countries.

What "liberty" minded people often refuse to acknowledge is that demographic trends exist and that the exceptions don't matter when you live in a hyper-inclusive mass democracy. In a democracy, it doesn't matter that 20% of non-whites vote for smaller government and candidates other than Democrats because you're going to end up with what the majority wants.

Like it or not, white people are the only demographic of people who vote for small government more than fifty percent of the time. If your objective is small government or no government, sitting on your hands and libeling opponents of unrestricted immigration will guarantee your failure given that the children of the economic and religious migrants you're defending are going to vote for the government's expansion.

The left lost the intellectual debate when the Soviet union fell. As a result, they stopped trying to sway white people and started using the state to replace them.

When white people disappear, all possibility of a libertarian, voluntaryist, or anarchist society will disappear with them.