RE: Michigan mom says she could face jail time for not vaccinating her son
Benton G. Richardson, a lawyer for Bredow's ex-husband, told ABC News that "this case is not truly about vaccinations."
Richardson added that Bredow and Horne have been embroiled in an ongoing legal battle, and a court sided with Horne in November of 2016, ordering Bredow to vaccinate her son.
Court documents obtained by ABC News state that a court first asked Bredow to get immunizations for her son in November 2016, but state that as of September 2017 the child had not been vaccinated.
"It is our position that this case is not truly about vaccinations," Richardson said. "It is a case about Ms. Bredow refusing to comport with any number of the court's orders and actively seeking to frustrate Mr. Horne's joint legal custody rights."
The local and state authorities did not have much of a problem with her choice. It's her ex husband. Which in itself becomes another issue.
It's actually about the lies of the vaccine manufacturers, the lies of the FDA, the lies of the state government of Kalifornia, and the fact that forced, non-consensual (redundant I know) medical procedures are actual war crime under the Nuremberg code, and Geneva conventions.
From Mengele to Kalifornia, will the state ever stop trying to act like they own us? I don't think they will.
Sorry for the late response. No they won't try and stop squeezing anything from the populace. But. Aren't people part of the problem? If there was a consensus that vaccines, or other issues were a problem then the legislation that creates the law and the people who I force it are just as bad. Think about the "crazy" laws that are not enforced-25yrs ago you couldn't do certain things-go to any school w/out vacs. Now there is a choice. Her relationship with her husband is the same...first it's ok-no vaccines, they get divorced, get different ideas, disagree on vaccines. The law is for vaccination. Unfortunately until there is overwhelming evidence not theories or suppositions of being harmful vacswill be for the majority.
We don't live in a democracy. We live in a constitutional republic. It doesn't matter what nonsense the majority believes when it comes to individual natural rights.
The fact is that vaccines do cause harm. It is unfortunate that many people deliberately avoid the information that would disabuse them of the notion that vaccines are safe across the board, but that still does not give them the right to choose for me.
It is also a fact that ANY medical procedure that is mandated is in violation of individual natural rights, and international convention. Informed consent is required.
Self defense by all means possible is fully justified if these little Mengeles try to mandate medical procedures for me or mine. I would see civilization razed to the ground, and humanity extinct before I will surrender my individual natural rights to the ignorant.
While I may have sympathy for the woman in this post, I think that this is an example that should inform us all about the care we should take when deciding with whom we should or should not have children.
Unfortunately. We do not live a republic. Not for a while. The majority of the public doesn't know or understand this. They understand democracy.