You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Vaccines Increase Your Chances of Catching Infectious Disease - Study Reveals!
Your selective omission of data to further your narrative is appalling, as is your accusations that scientists stand to blame for your misplaced fears.
You say "In health and truth", yet promote neither of these with the continued misuse of the "Science" tag and cherry-picked data.
Did you make those pie charts all by yourself? This would be considered "analysis" only by those who lack basic scientific literacy.
If you're going to talk ridiculous shit about an entire community (of which the STEM community is the only reason for your relevance and ability to monetize this drivel) than be prepared for some warranted backlash.
If you read the article (and my previous one) you would know that the graphs and the study were carried out and written by Dr Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D. If you have an issue with it take it up with him.
Enjoy the vote and reward!
You cite a single study as infallible proof? You are scientifically illiterate then. I don't even mean that as an insult; it's just matter of fact. This is actually problematic and shows a fundamental misunderstanding of science.
I say that as a scientist, and as someone who was formerly part of the conspiratorial crowd and quasi-spiritual neo-hippy community. I understand the thinking and reasoning behind all this, and it is flawed. I have been wrong before, and the hardest part was realizing how wrong I was to uphold such narratives that harmed others; all the while I acted so self-righteous with an imagined self-importance.
If we can help, please let us know. Until then, don't talk shit about science then use it in a tag as if you understand it at all.
It seems that you are the illeterate one as you seem to have trouble reading and discerning - you've done it twice in two comments so you have a 100% strike-rate.
Clearly you have not properly reviewed or understood the post and the sources that the data came from. The data came from multiple studies, in multiple nations for 7 different diseases.
If you can't read a simple post and understand it why should I listen to you? You are clearly biased which may explain why you are cherry-picking sections of the post and ignoring others. The irony is that this is what you are accusing me of!
The sciences were bought and paid for over 100 years ago. Most scientists do not know this, most of them are good people that mean well but unfortunately most of them are deceived.
Maybe you will listen to what these scientists have to say about medical and scientific studies?
"Most scientists don't know this. Click here to find out why!" is basically how most of this material reads. Make better clickbait before you tag Science again.
You said: "If you read the article (and my previous one) you would know that the graphs and the study were carried out and written by Dr Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D. If you have an issue with it take it up with him."
GIven that statement and the terms "study" (singular) and a singular person given direction to, yeah, I'll have my skepticism of your interpretation of someone else interpreting their results, especially when they perpetuate a dangerous anti-science narrative.
What happens when I get to three strikes? Does your entire community come and smite big bad science to exercise their moral supremacy and absolutism?
? what do u mean