RE: Do Vaccines Cause Cancer?
When you're capable of sarcasm off again and chewing on what I said in hindsight of ALL that I said you'll realize I have given you unsolicited advice worth more than all the books you have on microbiology combined. But do keep making claims that the Virologist Community can defend themselves, or claims in general devoid of Logic or Fact and wholly as an appeal to popularity and conventional wisdom on matters that have an intimate and deadly cost should they be wrong to most everyone who's lied to or outright forced into such matters.
kinda on a tanget, do you know how many microbiologist have died of Suicide, or of Murder/Suicide (still suicide) or Car Crashes or other Mysterious Deaths such as fast growing tumors? Last time I checked since 9/11 the list was over 250.
Thank you for your wisdom, it was well noted. I wasn't aware of the suicide, or anything of that matter...Probably we can agree to disagree on some things....i am not fan of vaccines being thrown down anyone throat, I believe in first educating patients and then gaining consent...i also want to let you know that quite few advances in virology with regard to detection of these viruses, its no longer a mystery and the molecular biology behind a few of their mechanism are well known, PCR is transforming diagnosis as we speak, results for most of todays test are available within 24 hours and we can look at CPE to identify characteristics of certain viruses when they evade the immune system....steemian advances are being made, probably if more money is dedicated towards these kind of research rather than shareholders probably we would eradicate much more...we can all agree that vaccines aren't 100% safe but we can appreciate the thought process behind them... once again I appreciate and welcome your views, and you need not to worry I don't drink all the kool-aid thrown at me
No they are not, not well known at all and this would be immediately understood if you read the study I linked or by simply telling us What these mechanisms are and then we can see if we can conclude Well Known or not.
So?
And how did you get to those characteristics to begin with for the said viruses? In other words you're saying that if we cannot detect them by antibody we can detect them by how the cell is attacked, because it has been demonstrated that the virus is characteristic in these ways, because ....
I've pointed to their Ghastly history, I've pointed to the fact that it was fraud back in the day as milkmaids weren't any more protected than the rest of the population as outbreaks happened among those that inoculated by scraping or otherwise seeking to infect themselves with the puss of the cowpox for 1400 years before Edward Jenner killed his first son and spared his second on a old wife's tale and after tens of thousands died by mandate while the vaccine induced illness was also by mandate and testimony of nurses and doctors under-reported or not reported by a factor of 15:1, and you cannot appreciate that the method for providing immunity has been a work of COMPLETE-FICTION, and not just embellishments or exaggerations and it remains so to this day, as admitting that (as the study that I posted did on 3 different levels admitted the impossibility of predicting reliably such reactions) the pictures of viruses are by and large fabrications and complete falsehoods equal to that the "key and lock" analogy was also work of COMPLETE-FICTION, along with the "Immune system Learns and Adapts because of viruses" would undermine any and all credibility there is to "Virology".
What you eat I don't shit.
Oh my...whats your discord or Steem.chat name, lets have a chat there, we would go on forever here
ruminate on this http://whale.to/w/ebola.html