Before i reply, Below response is not so I get reviewed.

The example you presented above is data. Its not part of github so not a code.

Reason for my disappointment is not this issue or this review but how the category is operating in general. I think i should be frank about it now:

1. Category has been modified to expect proposing a solution. In corporate world, no tester ever provides a bug fix. Thats the task of a developer. How many technologies do you think a person can code and debug in.

2. Even after an issue is accepted by a PO, there's a 50/50 chance that it will get considered by utopian because one of the 2 reasons

• Its not an issue because it doesn't fall into the category.
• Its too little to be rewarded even though there is an option to mark something Negligible fix which rewards with 5$ up vote. I don't know whats small than that.

1. Inconsistent definitions for the questions.
   For example: If a PO has accepted an issue after it was posted to utopian, some mods consider it as not accepted by PO while other consider it as being accepted by PO if it was accepted before the review.

I hope to don't take it personally because I am not trying to single out any one person here, I am just providing insight on what I feel as a contributor.

CC: @sachincool, @fego, @tobias-g
Marking you guys CC so maybe it helps the category in some way.