RE: QUIQQER week in review - 2019 / 12
Thank you for your contribution.
This is another informative weekly report from you, and I appreciate the time and effort you put into your work. Your review is interesting, and contains valuable insights about your personal experience of working on this project. Keep up the good work.
I appreciate the fact that you took the time to share information about the obstacles you were faced with, as well as the course of action taken to overcome those issues. This is the kind of editorial content we particularly like to see in blog posts, and it goes without saying that I enjoyed reading your work. To be honest, I wanted to see more editorial content in your review, but I can't say that I'm not pleased with the effort.
That said, I believe that this post could have been better written. There were serious issues of style and proofreading, and I would be happy to cite a few examples in a follow-up comment, if you wish.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
Thanks. I'd appriciate it if you take the time to show me some improvements. the blogposts are practice for me to get better with writing. I tried to implement the last suggestions of you so I'm always happy to get improvements
Hello!
I will cite a few examples for you:
Let me rephrase that: "We are back again with a weekly report of what happened in the QUIQQER universe."
This would be a better sentence: "Each possibility to observe different logins feels like searching for the needle in the haystack."
This sentence would be a better sentence: "Even though this means more stress for us, we test our software on our own body, and have no other choice but to fix it and make it executable."
I hope you will find this comment useful.
Thank you for your review, @lordneroo! Keep up the good work!