Hello, @arnavr!
Thank you for your contribution. This is a rather useful tool, and you did a good job in providing valuable information about this project. Your post is comprehensive and informative.
On the content side, even though I like all the information presented, I must admit that I wanted to see more editorial content in your review. The post certainly contains technical information related to the project, but tells the readers so little about your personal experience of using this tool.
Furthermore, I must admit that I wish you had presented all the information in a simplified manner. The post is highly technical, which makes it hard for your readers to get a grasp on the key points for the whole text. Regardless, I enjoyed reading about your personal suggestions, and appreciate the effort you put into your work.
That said, the post did have proofreading issues, but not to the level where it hurt the reading experience. In conclusion, I enjoyed reading your work, and look forward to your next contribution.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
Thank you for your review, @lordneroo! Keep up the good work!