You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: KURE Curation Community Network - Update 10 - Comments! View, Write and Post Comments!
Can you explain the evaluation? You seem a lot tougher on your judgment. It's the first time I've gotten below 75 I think...
- "The post is of decent quality."
What would be a high quality post for you? I've scored high on all of the other posts where I take the time to put images and explain things. The first one or two I wasn't as descriptive.
- "Average - it follows most best practices."
I'm curious, what have I forgotten to do this time around? I've gotten highs on all my previous posts.
For the commits and comments, do you have suggestions for what I should do to improve them? This time I admit the comments I didn't put @params for all of the functions, but the commits I try to describe them as I have before, and gotten rated as "high".
Thanks for helping me improve.
Hello, don't be upset, 73 is still very high (in my standard). I think you can improve your next contribution in the following area:
Sort the Comments, comments should be clear and add additional values.Don't take these as criticisms, you are already doing very good job and I am hoping to see more from you soon.
Thanks, I will take that into consideration. What about "The post is of decent quality."? You didn't answer me on that point. Your review and that of 3 other reviewers in utopian don't match on that category, as they all rate the posts I make as "high".
Look at my first post that got an "decent" rating:
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@krnel/kure-development-update
It's much different than this above post, and all the others before that (update 2-9).
Look at all the other posts where I increased the quality of the post, and got a "high":
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@krnel/kure-development-update-2-managing-users
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@krnel/kure-development-update-3-permissions-and-communities-you-joined
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@krnel/kure-development-update-4-browsing-content-and-adding-to-communities
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@krnel/kure-development-update-5-home-page-filter-content-and-personalized-sidebar
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@krnel/kure-development-update-6-view-content-and-communities-request-to-join-communities-and-approve-deny-requests
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@krnel/kure-development-update-7-now-online-with-individual-community-group-pages-to-view-and-join-communities
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@krnel/kure-development-update-8-ui-ux-candy-mobile-menu-infinite-scroll-and-lots-of-fixes
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@krnel/kure-development-update-9-upvoting-content-and-pages-for-blogs-feeds-tags-created-hot-promoted-and-trending
And then look at this post you reviewed again. Why does it fall into "decent" when it is of high quality like all the others (except the first post)? I don't understand how you can rate it as "decent" only. Please elaborate on why you judged it as only decent, in contrast to 3 of your colleagues who rate my post quality as high.
Thank you.
I understand your points. The
decentandhighare quite subjective, that depends on the opinions of the reviewer. I am sorry that I felt it is ‘decent’ which is still very good.Utopian does not have a clear guidance on when to rank ‘decent’ and when to rank ‘high’, if there is, and if it is a very clear criteria I am sure every reviewers will follow and mark the same.
Ok. I had asked previously "What would be a high quality post for you?" Can you show me a high quality post so I know what I need to do?
If there is no criteria from utopian for this category of quality post, how does one judge it one way or another?
Thanks.