You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Simplify Steem blockchain rewards by distributing only STEEM and SP but not SBD
This is an interesting idea. Simplicity is always preferred to complexity, and complexity should have a strong justification. The complexity for rewards distribution was driven by the desire to peg SBD to the dollar. When that broke down, the hard peg was disavowed by Stinc, treated instead as a soft floor.
Without a commitment to the hard peg, the complexity of distribution is no longer justified. You present a more elegant solution, which (ironically) actually will strengthen the peg, as your solution incorporates reverse conversion.
Very elegant. Good luck convincing the witnesses!
Thanks.
Is there a chatroom/platform where one can directly submit proposals for consideration by the witnesses?
I believe the growth of the Steem blockchain has been inhibited by the complexity of how the system works. People have generally been advised to consider complex cryptocurrency systems as scams or unviable projects.
Those types of proposal are submitted and debated on the GitHub.
Thanks for the info.
I think I read somewhere that @utopian-io uses the user's synced GitHub account to automatically open issues on GitHub for posts accepted on utopian.io?
I have checked all 306 open issues by just their titles but I cannot find anything related to this post.
You have to actively sync it. I haven't done that, but I'm sure there is a guide.
Do Utopian posts generate GitHub issues?
According to @jestemkioskiem via email:
Oh, interesting. So Steem hasn't opted in, I guess.
github.com/steemit/steem does not even allow suggestions as GitHub issues:
https://github.com/steemit/steem/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
Wow. OK. So I guess back to square one, try to get a witnesses attention to review your proposal and then give it a boost if they think it's a good idea.
You have to actively sync it. I haven't done that, but I'm sure there is a guide.
Those types of proposal are submitted and debated on the GitHub.