I have re-evaluated but still cannot see why this should be approved. I am not judging the contribution by the lines of code - I am judging it by the changeset.

This 'trivial' change required database changes, graphical designs, careful discussion about the wordings used and extensive testing on our test server with multiple accounts

• Database change is a trivial task.
• Graphical designs are irrelevant to the "development" category.
• "wording" work is also irrelevant. we have also "copywriting" category. It's not directly related to development.
• Testing is not something we can evaluate so it's relevant either.

Sorry, but actual development made here is trivial. You may contact @amosbastian about a reconsideration.