This brings up an interesting point - sometimes it's better if your "money" or "means of exchange/unit of account" isn't actually good for anything. That prevents it from being subject to the swings of supply and demand from use, which makes it a better base for contract law and exchange agreements (nobody wants price exposure/volatility in trade).

Thanks for the post, I enjoyed your humorous commentary. I'd like to think this was some sort of "high water mark/shoeshine boy" type of moment, but truthfully there are a bunch of cryptos with basically no use whatsoever that have traded for years.

I don't know which way is up anymore.