RE: Ned Stark Exposes The Dangers of Energy Saving Light bulbs And Offers You A Safer Alternative
You flag me I'll flag you.
Are you sure that you are old enough to be taking images of naked women? This comment certainly speaks to the contrary. Rather than immaturely downvoting my post in retaliation, why not be a man and take responsibility for your own actions that led to I and 9 others flagging you?
When browsing steemit.chat, I very nearly subjected a child to some grossly inappropriate images. If you are going to post links in steemit.chat then you need to ensure that your header image is SFW.
If I see this again, I will downvote it again. Whether you flag me back as you have threatened or not, is literally irrelevant. It is a matter of principal for me, and you can ask around about Lord Eddard Stark's principals.. You will find that I break them for no one.
That's what you people are complaining about a censored thumbnail image less than 1" in size that you can see her underboob and no nipple. ROFLMAFAO!!! You have to be kidding. Are are you projecting it to 80" Screen?
Which BTW is allowed on FB, IG, and Amazon even allows full breasts in their search results. A woman can wear pasties in public as well if you didn't know.
My Header image is censored and SFW by all major social media standards and the post is Tagged NSFW. On the post you flagged. I followed all rules. If you saw something else that's not my fault. And I'll keep flagging you if you flag me. Your children are not my responsibility. And how is seeing a bare breast going to hurt them. (which the image was censored that you flagged. Further more all of the countries that have more openness toward sex and nudity have lower STD rates, lower teen pregnancy, and had lower rape rates until the Refugees from the restrictive anti-sex and anti-nudity countries came in and ruined for everyone. You you're not protecting your children from anything and they have seen breast before.
And as I recall Lord Eddard Stark's principals got his head chopped off so I'd not make him a role model.
I would expect a "man" in your position to possess a greater understanding of sexual provocation. Why should a nipple matter when every other part of the woman is completely naked? You do not need to show nipples, vaginas or fucking sphincters for a photograph to be inappropriate. A good photographer, can convey a deep sexual theme with a model that is fully clothed.
Yours is certainly not good photography. It is closer to "let's see how far I can get this camera up this young girls arse." That is not art, it's a creepy guy who never left puberty living out his teen fantasy of taking pictures of young naked women.
The second half of your comment is inaccurate and irrelevant to this issue. It is legalized prostitution that has the effects you are talking about, but legalizing sex as commerce between adults has absolutely nothing to do with subjecting very young girls to images that show women portraying themselves as a selection of holes for men to do with what they please.
That may be appropriate on Facebook and Instagram, and perhaps that's why I do not use Facebook or Instagram. This hypersexualization of children does the opposite of all the bullshit you're trying to use as an excuse for your actions. I can tell you really believe it though.
You believe this bullshit because you have to, it makes you feel better about the role you are playing in corrupting the youth of today. Perhaps one day, when you have matured to a point where you no longer feel the need to base your entire life and career on seeing the next pair of tits, then you will be able to stop and consider the psychological effects that your work has on young girls-- and boys.
Now, you have wasted enough of my time so I am muting you.