Children Hack the Election and “F**k With the Public” at DEFCON – #NewWorldNextWeek
This week on the New World Next Week: the White Helmets get rescued by Israel; (s)election hacking is now child's play; and the NXIVM case just keeps getting crazier.
Show notes and mp3 audio for this podcast: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=27593
▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS
Please look into the connections I made about the Cafritz foundation ties between NXVIM and Alefantis...
https://steemit.com/nxivm/@titusfrost/nxivm-arrests-bronfman-s-and-nancy-salzman-clinton-g-i-arrested-cafritz-and-alefantis-next
As long as the mass media is in the hands of big corporations voting is meaning less because too many people only look at what the mass media is telling them and so they can't relay give a educated vote.
The power that should not be don't have to hack the voting machines or paper ballots no voting system will work without educated voters.
Given the financial imperative that proves Steem's (and other distributed ledgers) mechanism, it would be quite facile to create secure elections online. That they don't is critically telling.
The recent study released that showed public sentiment has zero statistical relevance in legislation tells us why.
Thanks!
Well, let's get rid of electronic voting machines then: https://www.minds.com/blog/view/858930556422402048
How about we use distributed ledgers instead?
Had a conversation about that here: https://medium.com/@kevinsarpei/while-id-definitely-prefer-an-open-source-blockchain-based-voting-system-over-the-current-one-the-cf1720dc7539
You are right to consider the possibility of compromised hardware. My information is that all commercially available chips are backdoored at the factory, via the security block.
However, I do not believe this compromise is competent to actually insert code. I believe this mechanism is suitable only for tracking and surveillance purposes.
In addition to the hardware backdoor thing, there's also this:
"Voters being able to verify that their vote was counted sounds nice, but I’m thinking that would ultimately be quite meaningless, since the establishment could just make up voters who vote in its favor. “But a state only has so many people living in it, so the establishment can’t just make up voters.” Well, maybe not after the fact…"
And this (52:12-1:03:26):
Steem shows the way. Distributed ledgers are secure, private, and auditable.
Each voter can verify their own vote, and further verification can enable each cast vote to be verified by the voter that cast it. The latter audit would be expensive, but definitive, as any votes cast in the names of the dead, illegals, or folks that just didn't vote (or voted otherwise) would be not verifiable.
Simply canvassing those that cast votes would verify that those votes were actually cast by those voters. Even more exhaustive audits could ensure that one voter didn't cast multiple votes, by using voice recognition during canvassing, and then personally interviewing voters suspected of casting multiple votes while verifying those particular votes.
It could be the most secure and auditable voting system every devised.
The problem is though: who would know which vote belongs to which voter? The government would, right? Well, we both know the government is beyond corrupt, meaning I doubt the audits would be accurate.
Distributed ledgers are publicly auditable. I see no reason that individuals couldn't audit the vote themselves, personally.
When I worked in market research, we did audits of our marketing efforts. We'd take 10% of the calls an individual made and verify them by calling them back, and this provided a statistically accurate representation of each marketer's work.
Individual people wouldn't have to audit the entire vote to have a very reliable grasp of the accuracy of the whole. Concerned groups would be more able to conduct audits.
I am not a fan of government agencies, such as FDA, EPA, and so on. I know they are but vectors for corruption, which allows the very problems they're created to avoid to flourish.
I think concerned people should be able to just hire some work done, and if the science shows problems, then tort actions should be brought against offending parties. If Bayer knew they'd be on the hook for the medical bills for the victims of glyphosate, they wouldn't have touched Monsanto with a pole a thousand feet long.
The less government the better, and the less corruption there will be. Keep government out of audits. Then they'll be honest.
great work
as always great work!
The Evil Men Who Rig Our Elections Exposed!!
https://busy.org/@motherlibertynow/the-evil-men-who-rig-our-elections-exposed
Nice rock we live on hum❓ISRAEL 🇮🇱 helps ISIS , and according to France 🇫🇷 and USA 🇺🇸 corporation its IRAN 🇮🇷 who is evil ⁉️ Our voting system might as well be on nintendo 64 system ❗️And Marijuana is bad ❗️But liquor is good . Especially when its used to exploit others via its poison sales . So why do I obey the laws again⁉️
Q SOURCE X AND AIM EXPOSE ELECTION HACK.
▶ Lift The Veil chats with Q SOURCE X.
https://busy.org/@motherlibertynow/lift-the-veil-chats-with-q-source-x
(The Clowns attack the block-chain connection of those who expose this. Clowns using a quantum computer to spy on people and knock them off of Steemit).
we should give award to the kids