Lawyers Petition for 9/11 Grand Jury
Today we’re joined by Mick Harrison (and David Meiswinkle) of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry to discuss their recent petition to the U. S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to convene a special grand jury into the unprosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center Towers on September 11, 2001. We talk about the committee and its formation, the nature and powers of a special grand jury, and what legal options remain for those seeking justice for 9/11.
SHOW NOTES AND MP3 AUDIO: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=27961
▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS
nice video
Yeah so what ever happened to that piece of PROPAGANDA = NEVER FORGET ❗️That’s something you should make a video about .
by the way, when I type 9/11 NIST threaten public safety corbettreport
into the ThemTube searchbar I get 12 corbettreport results out of 13 (the first one is not corbettreport but a snippet from James Corbett) and 9/11 A conspiracy theory is place 6
so not deleted from the searching in that way.
Oh, in fact. I just checked again. I can find it again! "9/11 A conspiracy theory" James Corbett or corbettreport first place.
Thank you so much for reporting on this, it is amazing!
I'm all for it let's see if the justice system has any legitimacy. If it does not offer any justice, expose their actions to the public. You can't really look into this subject any longer the two hours of research before the serious holes in the story are just unavoidable. (If you can keep your emotions under control) The criminals need to be exposed, wars have been started over this attack on the American people, too many people have died over this lie.
Great interview Corbett. Great topic as well. Since this was a 911 episode I wondered if you had seen the Synthetic Rebellion spoof/parody made of you and the other James about it. I thought it was funny in a way that denotes some sort of love. Regardless, keep up the great work you do.
Excellent report as always!
I am struck by the paucity of charges that are put forward, as given the extant charges included, additional evidence exists for what I believe (IANAL) are federal crimes of conspiracy, treason, and more, and those charges should naturally follow and be considered by the Special Grand Jury sought.
It is impossible to ignore the BBC report of Building 7 being destroyed prior to it's destruction, and it is able to be explained in no other way than BBC participation in a conspiracy to conceal the criminal complicity in the attack by the BBC and it's fellow conspirators, including whoever told them the building had been destroyed prior to it's destruction.
Treason, obstruction, misprision, fraud, and many, many more federal crimes necessarily must have been committed by those parties that undertook the terrorist attack, their co-conspirators, and beneficiaries of the financial, political, and military consequences resulting therefrom.
I suspect, and certainly hope, that evidence thereof and preparations to introduce it are being acquired, considered, and secured.
While it is cliche that the indictment process is under the control of the prosecution, and that office can generate - or preclude - indictments at their sole option (consider the proceedings recently in New Mexico regarding the school shooter training camp and how it has been so immunized from legal action), I can see the reason for hope that presenting such evidence to a Special Grand Jury will be likely to produce indictiment even against the will of federal prosecutors.
Jury selection will be of the essence in this case, and I hope that has been duly considered and prepared for as well.
Thanks!