You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Killing transparencybot - A message to spammers with no SP!
Several people tried speaking with you Craig. You could have chosen to engage and create a useful reporting service that was non-judgemental and provided some value.
You also never had an Opt Out built into your bot code which a python child could do.
By @steemcleaners definition you are a comment farming spammer which is why you were added to the @broombot blacklist. That is where spammers go pal. Spammers. Spammer. Spamme. Spamm. Spam. Spa. Sp. S. .
All I can say man is, if this is your big dream, @transparencybot, might I gently suggest you may want to develop a new dream?
How were his comments judgemental?
???
He is 100% against bidbots. He rewards people using the tag nobidbots. Have you even read and understood the context of your quote?
You didn't answer my question.
So we're censoring people because of their personal views? Steem has a bright future for sure...
How dare he!??!!! This clearly makes huge harm to steem ecosystem!!!
I did answer your question. You are too obtuse to understand my answer.
Okay, once again:
Please show me the judgemental part in this quote.
Or let's see the whole @transparencybot comment:
Example:
This post has received votes totaling more than $50.00 from the following pay for vote services:
appreciator upvote in the amount of $116.25 STU, $145.59 USD.
rocky1 upvote in the amount of $85.97 STU, $107.67 USD.
upme upvote in the amount of $80.02 STU, $100.22 USD.
buildawhale upvote in the amount of $60.79 STU, $76.14 USD.
therising upvote in the amount of $44.26 STU, $55.43 USD.
For a total calculated value of $387 STU, $485 USD before curation, with a calculated curation of $97 USD.
This information is being presented in the interest of transparency on our platform and is by no means a judgement as to the quality of this post.
Show me the judgemental part.
And suddenly there was stillness all over the place....
Its judgemental to act like promoting a post more than a certain amount requires additional attention or transparency, and to force that opinion on peoples blogs with your comments.
People should be allowed to chose how they promote their posts without getting unsolicited spam.
There absolutely must be an opt out, nevermind it should actually be opt-in
Devil's advocate here: Well, in this case I decide to repost my very same article every 5 minutes, my freely chosen form of promotion. I hope you don't dare shaming me for my free choice. You could simply mute me, but please don't comment on my repetitive posting. (No I'm not going to do this, just consider this a provocative thought experiment)
you're attempting to defame peoples blogs
do it on your own blog.