What is the inner value of a token?

in #token4 years ago

What is the inner value of a tokenplay.jpg

Watch on Odysee

When I was a banker quite some years ago, I dealt often with stocks and bonds. I've studied the field and it was quite easy for me to define the inner value of a stock according to certain indicators. Like that I could build a nice portfolio of shares that I knew were bought at a good price.

How to define the value of a token ?

Like many of you, I lived through the ICO wave and then the STO wave and later I met all the DEFI stuff. I've seen many things and many projects were still born or abandoned. So how can we define the inner value of a token or a crypto currency ?

The distribution

One of the most important factors to evaluate the inner value of a token is to look at it's distribution. How many people are owning and using the token? The more people use it the better. There are a lot of very high market caps where very few people own the token. The market cap and the token price can be manipulated quite easily, especially when few people own this token.

The more people actively use the token the better

The use cases

There are so many different tokens and not all of them have meaningful use cases. If you have a token that can be staked for the sake to produce more of the same token it is nice and well but in the end this won't be enough. When you have new tokens produced, what can you do with the existing ones?

When you look at Etherieum, the principal use case is to use all the fancy tokens on the etherieum blockchain to pay the gaz fees. It's an use case.

Let's look at Bitcoin. The use case of bitcoin is to protect your fortune. Thanks to the deflationary aspect of the coin, people see it as a perfect fit to protect their capital and to profit from the price development. But with bitcoin it's not possible to pay stuff.

For every use case there is a competition between tokens and blockchains. Some will not survive and some with strive.

If you combine distribution and use cases together this is for me a good indicator for the internal value of a token.

The network effect

I've seen a lot of projects lately that integrate several blockchains into their services. This is a very important success factor because linking blockchains and token economies together is an amazing multiplication effect for the distribution of the token and of the use cases.

These are the indicators that I try to use to evaluate the potential of a token. For me the short term price doesn't matter that much. What does a nice price development mean when the token won't be around anymore in the near future?

But tell me how do you define the inner value of a token?




Let's connect on Steem, Lbry or on Publish0x

My free e-mail course: The 100'000 satoshis a week strategy

Sort:  

As a follower of @followforupvotes this post has been randomly selected and upvoted! Enjoy your upvote and have a great day!

Interesting analysis about the variables that define the internal value of tokens, greetings and thanks for sharing important information.

Thanks for stopping by!

Dear @achim03

Another interesting choice of topic. I truly wasn't aware that you were a banker in the past. Or pehaps I just forgot (old me, old me)

Like many of you, I lived through the ICO wave and then the STO wave

Didn't you have impression, that STO never did as well as ICOs? Somehow STO wave was ... hardly noticed.

ps.
I'm not sure if I agree your points about distribution. It seem that you believe, that mass adoption is always good and necessary. I don't think that way.
If I had to choose distributing token to 10k people (mostly random) or distribute token to 1000 people who are slowly but steadily selected and who are aware of the project, risks of it and are supportive -> then I would rather choose second option.

Use cases is what I would care more than amount of people participating. But that's just me.

Have a great monday ahead of you :) Upvote on the way.
Yours, Piotr

Hi @crypto.piotr,
Thanks for your great comment.

Didn't you have impression, that STO never did as well as ICOs? Somehow STO wave was ... hardly noticed.

I agree with you the problem with STO was that ICO had already desilussioned most people.

I'm not sure if I agree your points about distribution. It seem that you believe, that mass adoption is always good and necessary. I don't think that way.

If I look at the distribution of a token, I believe that if the more people own it, the more legitimacy it has. Of course this is my personal opinion only. I think that it's not a big difference if there 10K or 1K who own the token. But it makes a big difference if it's 50 people or 1'000 people. For many tokens I think that there are not even 1000 token owners.

Wish you a nice week start!
Best regards,
Achim

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.23
TRX 0.20
JST 0.035
BTC 97105.70
ETH 3328.65
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.16